Both reading and listening are about the reasons of the appearance of Little Ice Age, which was a period of unusually cold temperatures in many parts of the world that lasted from about the year 1350 until 1900 C.E. The author of the reading states three reasons and the professor refutes the author's reasons.
First of all, based on the passage disruption of ocean currents was the cause of the Little Ice Age. The professor rebuts this point when he says this point can be true only about some part of the cold areas in Little Ice Age such as Europe and the US, but it doesn't explain why southern areas has been cooled down.
Second, the article states that volcanic eruptions could have been the factor that resulted in Little Ice Age. The lecturer disagrees with this idea and he claims that if volcanic eruptions were the reason, they should be much more stronger to cause the cold temperature. People should have seen visual signs such as grey snow or lack of sunlight. However, there were no signs like these. Therefor, volcanic eruptions couldn't have been contributed to the Ice Age.
Third,substantial decreases in human populations may have resulted in cooling of the climate indirectly. The professor contrasts with this hypothesize when he mentions that the decline in the population of humans didn't last that much and recovered again. Hence we can not assume that the decreased number of population leaded to cooling the cooled parts.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 70, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e about the reasons of the appearance of Little Ice Age, which was a period of un...
^^
Line 3, column 261, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...e Age such as Europe and the US, but it doesnt explain why southern areas has been coo...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 228, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'stronger' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: stronger
...ns were the reason, they should be much more stronger to cause the cold temperature. People s...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 419, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
...ike these. Therefor, volcanic eruptions couldnt have been contributed to the Ice Age. ...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 6, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , substantial
...een contributed to the Ice Age. Third,substantial decreases in human populations may have...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 214, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...the decline in the population of humans didnt last that much and recovered again. He...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 238, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ation of humans didnt last that much and recovered again. Hence we can not assume...
^^
Line 7, column 257, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...nt last that much and recovered again. Hence we can not assume that the decreased nu...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, however, if, may, second, so, third, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 30.3222958057 106% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1212.0 1373.03311258 88% => OK
No of words: 247.0 270.72406181 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90688259109 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96437052324 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46387461058 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 145.348785872 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578947368421 0.540411800872 107% => OK
syllable_count: 368.1 419.366225166 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.23620309051 61% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 72.5826972073 49.2860985944 147% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.181818182 110.228320801 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4545454545 21.698381199 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06452816374 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 4.19205298013 191% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.268657547929 0.272083759551 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.08471258443 0.0996497079465 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101586053613 0.0662205650399 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161513631945 0.162205337803 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.134742204345 0.0443174109184 304% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.3589403974 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 53.8541721854 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.2367328918 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 63.6247240618 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.5 10.7273730684 163% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.