The main top of both reading passage and lecture are about mass extiniction of more than half of species at the end Triassic period The writer claims three theriories tthat explain cause of this extiniction However the lecturer casts doubt on claim made i

Essay topics:

The main top of both reading passage and lecture are about mass- extiniction of more than half of species at the end Triassic period. The writer claims three theriories tthat explain cause of this extiniction. However, the lecturer casts doubt on claim made in artucle. He suggests, the reasons which are mentioned in passage do not have a good explanation for mass- extiniction.
First, the author states, decline of sea levels destroied species which lived in shallow -ocean and coast, moreover, it had a great effect on food chain. This ststement is challenged by professor. She states, species can adapt to this declination,hence this change need long time to occure more than million years. Furthermore, only sudden change in sealevel can has a negative impact on species.
Second, the author asserts, climate cooling as a reason for mass- extiniction. Volcano can release carbon dioxide and sulfur gas which decrease in atmospher temperature. The prefessor in the other hand refutes this notion. She mentions, these gases do not stay in air for long time. It will be removed quicly from atmospher. Carbon dioxide will combine with water. Therefore volcanic eruption is not stronge reason for mass- extiniction.
Lastly, the author points to asteroids which hit earth may cause soil and crush rock and leavr crater behind. These block sun light and lead yo decrease in temprature. The professor contradicts this point, She says, we never seen any crater in the same time of extinictiom. Furthermore these craters present many years before extiniction period.

The main top of both reading passage and lecture are about mass- extiniction of more than half of species at the end Triassic period. The writer claims three theriories tthat explain cause of this extiniction. However, the lecturer casts doubt on claim made in artucle. He suggests, the reasons which are mentioned in passage do not have a good explanation for mass- extiniction.
First, the author states, decline of sea levels destroied species which lived in shallow -ocean and coast, moreover, it had a great effect on food chain. This ststement is challenged by professor. She states, species can adapt to this declination,hence this change need long time to occure more than million years. Furthermore, only sudden change in sealevel can has a negative impact on species.
Second, the author asserts, climate cooling as a reason for mass- extiniction. Volcano can release carbon dioxide and sulfur gas which decrease in atmospher temperature. The prefessor in the other hand refutes this notion. She mentions, these gases do not stay in air for long time. It will be removed quicly from atmospher. Carbon dioxide will combine with water. Therefore volcanic eruption is not stronge reason for mass- extiniction.
Lastly, the author points to asteroids which hit earth may cause soil and crush rock and leavr crater behind. These block sun light and lead yo decrease in temprature. The professor contradicts this point, She says, we never seen any crater in the same time of extinictiom. Furthermore these craters present many years before extiniction period.

Votes
Average: 6.5 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2021-07-08 talelaldabous 65 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user talelaldabous :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The main top of both reading passage and...
^^
Line 1, column 82, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d lecture are about mass- extiniction of more than half of species at the end Tri...
^^
Line 2, column 247, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , hence
...s, species can adapt to this declination,hence this change need long time to occure mo...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 301, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a million'.
Suggestion: a million
...ange need long time to occure more than million years. Furthermore, only sudden change ...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 364, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[2]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'have'
Suggestion: have
...ore, only sudden change in sealevel can has a negative impact on species. Second,...
^^^
Line 3, column 228, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the other hand refutes this notion. She mentions, these gases do not stay in air...
^^
Line 3, column 368, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...Carbon dioxide will combine with water. Therefore volcanic eruption is not stronge reason...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... stronge reason for mass- extiniction. Lastly, the author points to asteroids w...
^^^
Line 4, column 277, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Furthermore,
...crater in the same time of extinictiom. Furthermore these craters present many years before...
^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, hence, however, lastly, may, moreover, second, so, therefore

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.4613686534 48% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 12.0772626932 33% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 22.412803532 71% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 30.3222958057 92% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.01324503311 199% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1315.0 1373.03311258 96% => OK
No of words: 252.0 270.72406181 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21825396825 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6840743004 2.5805825403 104% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 145.348785872 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.662698412698 0.540411800872 123% => OK
syllable_count: 393.3 419.366225166 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 3.25607064018 307% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 13.0662251656 145% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 21.2450331126 61% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.5942068395 49.2860985944 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 69.2105263158 110.228320801 63% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.2631578947 21.698381199 61% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.21052631579 7.06452816374 60% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 4.19205298013 215% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.27373068433 211% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.339516993714 0.272083759551 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0909724177221 0.0996497079465 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.159876509636 0.0662205650399 241% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.216918810959 0.162205337803 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.27968407525 0.0443174109184 631% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 13.3589403974 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.28 53.8541721854 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.0289183223 76% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.11 12.2367328918 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.42419426049 104% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 63.6247240618 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.498013245 69% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 65.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.