The main topic of reading passage and lecture about creation of new regulation rules for handling coal ash. The writer claims several explanation to argue that strick regulation are unnecessary. The lecturer casts doubt on claim made in article. She cites, these strick regulation are important for handling and storing coal ash.
First, the author states, environment regulation already exist. companies using liner-special material to prevent leakage of coal ash in surrounding area. This statement is challenged by professor. She mentions, these liner material find only in new line. moreover, regulation should be involve in old lines to prevent leakage of coal ash to the environment. These old lines need fixation and management to prevent this pollution.
Second, the passage asserts, strick regulation decrease recycling of coal ash. The lecturer in the other hand refutes this notion. She elaborates on other material that undergo strick rules for many years like mercury, but still recycle and use s in a lot of field such medical purposes,
Finally, the auther suggest, creating new strict rules to regulate transportation of coal ash will increase electric cost. The lecturer contradict this point. She contends, this elevation in cost result in well wealth. She illustrates to, increasing to 50 billion dollar in electric price, when calculate it mathematicaly will cause 1% increase in electric bills which is not very concern comparing to its benefit.
The main topic of reading passage and lecture about creastion of new regulation rules for handlng coal ash. The writer claims several explanation to argue that strick regulation are unnecessary. The lecturer casts doubt on claim made in article. She cites, these strick regulation are important for handling and storing coal ash.
First, the author states, environment regulation already exist. companies using liner-special material to prevent leakage of coal ash in surrounding area. This statement is challenged by professor. She mentions, these liner material find only in new line. moreover, regulation should be involve in old lines to prevent leakage of coal ash to the environment. These old lines need fixation and management to prevent this polution.
Second, the passage asserts, strick regulation decrease recycling of coal ash. The lecturer in the other hand refutes this notion. She elaborates on other material that undergo strick rules for many years like mercury, but still recycle and use s in alot of field such medical purposes,
Finally, the auther suggest, creating new strict rules to regulate transportation of coal ash will increase electric cost. The lecturer cortadicts this point. She contends, this elevation in cost result in well wealth. She ilustrates to, increasing to 50 billion dollar in electric price, when calculate it mathmaticaly will cause 1% increase in electric bills which is not very concern comparing to its benefit.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-07-09 | talelaldabous | 60 | view |
- The readind passage and the lecture are both discussing genetic modification process to creat more trees and vegetables The writer claims three benefits from applying this process The lecturer contradicts each benefit which is given by articls First the a 65
- The passage and lecture about the artificial reefs the writer demonstrates three benefits of artificial reefs for increasing suitible habitat for fish the lecturer casts doubt on claim made in article He says several scientists belivieve the artificial re 80
- The reading passage and lecture disccus the possibility to colonize on asterriods The author claims three reasona that explain why it colonization on asteriods are posible The lecturer casts doubt on claim made in article He mentions no one of these reaso 68
- The reading passage and lecture are both about Pterosaurs which were ancient group of winged reptiles that lived together with dinosaurs and if they were capable of powered flight or just glide The writer claims several argument to explain that Pterosaurs 68
- The reading passage and the lecture are both talking about comuterize smart cars The writer claims several benefits by using this type of cars However the professor casts doubt on claim made in article She believes using computerize cars is not clear bene 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The main topic of reading passage and le...
^^^
Line 1, column 130, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun explanation seems to be countable; consider using: 'several explanations'.
Suggestion: several explanations
...for handlng coal ash. The writer claims several explanation to argue that strick regulation are unn...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 199, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...that strick regulation are unnecessary. The lecturer casts doubt on claim made in a...
^^^
Line 1, column 261, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this strick' or 'these stricks'?
Suggestion: this strick; these stricks
...bt on claim made in article. She cites, these strick regulation are important for handling a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 65, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Companies
..., environment regulation already exist. companies using liner-special material to prevent...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 213, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this liner' or 'these liners'?
Suggestion: this liner; these liners
... challenged by professor. She mentions, these liner material find only in new line. moreove...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 257, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Moreover
...e liner material find only in new line. moreover, regulation should be involve in old li...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 288, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'involved'?
Suggestion: involved
...ew line. moreover, regulation should be involve in old lines to prevent leakage of coal...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 39, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... Finally, the auther suggest, creating new strict rules to regulate transportat...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, moreover, second, so, still, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.4613686534 48% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 12.0772626932 33% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 22.412803532 76% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 5.01324503311 319% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1238.0 1373.03311258 90% => OK
No of words: 228.0 270.72406181 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.4298245614 5.08290768461 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88582923847 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73771353648 2.5805825403 106% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 145.348785872 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.622807017544 0.540411800872 115% => OK
syllable_count: 378.9 419.366225166 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 3.25607064018 307% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 21.2450331126 66% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 60.9087111483 49.2860985944 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 77.375 110.228320801 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.25 21.698381199 66% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.375 7.06452816374 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 4.19205298013 215% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.440767690697 0.272083759551 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.1448884399 0.0996497079465 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.141625842698 0.0662205650399 214% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.283283034514 0.162205337803 175% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.25974777325 0.0443174109184 586% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.3589403974 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 48.81 53.8541721854 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.62 12.2367328918 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.11 8.42419426049 108% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 63.6247240618 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.7273730684 51% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.498013245 72% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.