In many organizations, perhaps the best way to approach certain new projects is to assemble a group of people into a team.
Having a team of people attack a project offers several advantages. First of all, a group of people has a wider range of knowledge, expertise, and skills than any single individual is likely to possess. Also, because of the numbers of people involved and the greater resources they possess, a group can work more quickly in response to the task assigned to it and can come up with highly creative solutions to problems and issues. Sometimes these creative solutions come about because a group is more likely to make risky decisions that an individual might not undertake. This is because the group spreads responsibility for a decision to all the members and thus no single individual can be held accountable if the decision turns out to be wrong.
Taking part in a group process can be very rewarding for members of the team. Team members who have a voice in making a decision will no doubt feel better about carrying out the work that is entailed by the decision than they might doing work that is imposed on them by others. Also, the individual team member has a much better chance to "shine", to get his or her contributions and ideas not only recognized but recognized as highly significant, because a team's overall results can be more far-reaching and have greater impact than what might have otherwise been possible for the person to accomplish or contribute working alone.
the reading explained the advantages of working on a project with a team, but as the professor expressed in the lecture teamwork will not always have a good process and a reliable result.
As the reading states, a group of people has more knowledge, expertise, and skill than individuals. teamwork will go and finish very quickly also, all members of the group will take responsibility for the decisions that the group makes.
Moreover, in a group, people have an opportunity to show their ability because typically the teamwork will have a great result so, the members will be seen more when they are in the group.
In contrast, the professor explained, when a company created a team to work on a project with this view that they will take responsibility and get the work done so better, the result was horrible. anyone in the group had a free ride, there were not any contribution between them. the work moved so slowly because building an agreement in the group was kind of impossible.
After all, the result of the project was not creative or good. some of the group members had rested all the time then when it came to responsibility, the members ignored each other while the manager considered the work for all of them.
- TPO 31
- Toward the end of his life the Chevalier de Seingalt 1725 1798 wrote a long memoir recounting his life and adventures The Chevalier was a somewhat controversial figure but since he met many famous people including kings and writers his memoir has become a 71
- TPO 30
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?To improve the quality of education, universities should spend more money on salaries for university professors.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- tpo 29 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
the reading explained the advantages of wor...
^^^
Line 2, column 101, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Teamwork
... expertise, and skill than individuals. teamwork will go and finish very quickly also, a...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 197, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Anyone
...one so better, the result was horrible. anyone in the group had a free ride, there wer...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 280, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...were not any contribution between them. the work moved so slowly because building a...
^^^
Line 5, column 63, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Some
...f the project was not creative or good. some of the group members had rested all the...
^^^^
Line 5, column 63, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...f the project was not creative or good. some of the group members had rested all the time t...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, moreover, so, then, while, after all, in contrast, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 12.0772626932 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 22.412803532 40% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 30.3222958057 73% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1015.0 1373.03311258 74% => OK
No of words: 215.0 270.72406181 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.72093023256 5.08290768461 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82921379641 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65758504054 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 145.348785872 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.544186046512 0.540411800872 101% => OK
syllable_count: 315.0 419.366225166 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.4115995778 49.2860985944 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.777777778 110.228320801 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8888888889 21.698381199 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.66666666667 7.06452816374 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 4.19205298013 143% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.212860445675 0.272083759551 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.093155342045 0.0996497079465 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0361769289614 0.0662205650399 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124974783443 0.162205337803 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0255916516512 0.0443174109184 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.3589403974 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 53.8541721854 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 12.2367328918 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.71 8.42419426049 92% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 63.6247240618 63% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.7273730684 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.