Many people and scientists believe that playing video games is a waste of time and energy for the children and since the children are the cornerstone of a bright future for a prosprose society, they should not be allowed to play them. With that being said

Essay topics:

Many people and scientists believe that playing video games is a waste of time and energy for the children and since the children are the cornerstone of a bright future for a prosprose society, they should not be allowed to play them. With that being said, I believe that not only video games aren't harmless for the children, but also they are actually of great importance for the youngesters to be involved with. I will give three main reasons why I believe that video games are healthy, in following paragraphs.

First of all, children have a lot of time during the day and beside their school and homework they should be able to fill their daily time with safe and secure hobbies. Children need to enjoy their childhood and if they get involved in activities that might be of great fun, but not safe they might never enjoy their time as a child. for example imagine that if children start climbing trees because they don't have anyhting else to do and suddenly one of them slips and injures his or her spine and the poor child get paralized. While the same kid could simply be sitting on the couch, safe and sound, playing video games.This example clearly shows how video games that the children can sit behind a screen and enjoy them are much more safer thatn other activities.

Second of all, many recent researches has been conducted on the effect of video games on children's mind and the results confirm that when children are for example playing a mind game and they are constantly thinking about a mystery and the keys to solve it, it helps them to nurture their minds and also because anything is possible in video games and the children can do what they think is the best it helps to provide a great scope for imaginition in children and as we all know the importance of a healthy active mind, we can not deny the important role of video games in nurturing such minds. Also many children may find out what they are good at, in other word what is their talent by playing video games.

Finally, with the advances in technology and visual effects and video games with actual physical activity compabalities the children can play video games with physical activities that helps them to remain healthy and learn some skills while enjoying playing video games. For example if a child play skate board at home on a special stage made by the gaming compony for home usage, not only he or she is learning to ride a skate at home without any special tool or coach but also the child has a lot of physical activities from jumping around.

In conclusion, I believe that today children should be allowed to play video games. Playing video games is not a waste of time for children, because the children are safe around them, they can train their minds and find their talents playing video games and also instead of trying hard and spending lots of money on classes for learning a sport, they can simply learn and master what ever they want simply at home using video games.

According to the passage there has been two main theories about the reasons why sea otter population started declining. The first theory is environmental pollution and the second theory is attacks by predators. Three main reasons to support the first theory where discussed in the passage and also based on the lecture, answers have been provided for each reason and all of aformentioned reasons and responses will be addressed in next paragraphs.

The first mentioned reason based on the first theory for atter declining was that there has been water samples that shows the polluted water in the area. The professor provides a solid example that if that was true then dead bodies of animal should've been found by the shore, while there was never anything found, on the other hand the fact that no dead bodies were found supports the second theory that states that the predators are the reason for population decline.

The second reason is that even if the predators were the reason of this trajedy, the effect should've been on other sea mammals as well, but the facts say otherwise. According to the professor the change of diet in orca actually may cause this phenamenon since the whales were in danger because of humans they left and then the orca needed to feed on sea otters.

Finally the third reason states that because the pollution is more concentrated on some areas and not on others, it explains that why the population density is lower in that areas. This claime is answered easily, since the predators tend to hunt where they can easily go and hunt, therefore the sea otter population in deep waters has declined but not in shallow waters where they can not go easily.

Votes
Average: 0.3 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 243, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: should've
...hat was true then dead bodies of animal shouldve been found by the shore, while there wa...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...the reason for population decline. The second reason is that even if the preda...
^^^
Line 9, column 93, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: should've
... the reason of this trajedy, the effect shouldve been on other sea mammals as well, but ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Finally,
...orca needed to feed on sea otters. Finally the third reason states that because th...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, finally, first, if, may, second, so, then, therefore, third, well, while, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 10.4613686534 182% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 22.412803532 80% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1407.0 1373.03311258 102% => OK
No of words: 290.0 270.72406181 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85172413793 5.08290768461 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.34165353125 2.5805825403 91% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 145.348785872 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.503448275862 0.540411800872 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 432.0 419.366225166 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.23620309051 61% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 21.2450331126 151% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 62.6455835299 49.2860985944 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 156.333333333 110.228320801 142% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.2222222222 21.698381199 149% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.4444444444 7.06452816374 176% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0541529857488 0.272083759551 20% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0219881072542 0.0996497079465 22% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0216247687403 0.0662205650399 33% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0335816372303 0.162205337803 21% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00621214534535 0.0443174109184 14% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 13.3589403974 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.46 53.8541721854 88% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.0289183223 132% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 12.2367328918 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.42419426049 103% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 63.6247240618 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.498013245 141% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.2008830022 134% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.

Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.