The lecturer disputes the author's suggestive theory that human life on Venus cannot be maintained. He provides several reasons to cast doubt about the author's claims.
First, according to the lecturer spaceships on Venus will be destroyed upon landing because the atmospheric pressure on this planet is one hundred time that on the earth. However, the lecturer finds this idea debatable. He contends that life on Venus is possible. Theoretically speaking a station could be established floating on the surface of this planet. This spaceship is not likely to be destroyed because the atmospheric pressure at higher altitude is less than on the surface.
Second, the lecturer contradicts the fallacy of the passage that since no water or oxygen exist on the surface of Venus, astronauts have to bring these essential components from earth. The lecturer however argues that because oxygen and water can be produced from chemicals available on the surface of Venus, it is possible for the spaceship to produce them without having the need to bring them from earth.
Finally, the author argues that life on Venus is not possible because no enough sunlight reaches this planets. However, the lecturer refute these claims. He states that sunshine may penetrate the thin clouds layer. Moreover, some more sunlight could be provided from the clouds sunshine reflections
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 98, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...ible because no enough sunlight reaches this planets. However, the lecturer refute t...
^^^^
Line 7, column 244, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ouds layer. Moreover, some more sunlight could be provided from the clouds sunshi...
^^
Line 7, column 273, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'clouds'' or 'cloud's'?
Suggestion: clouds'; cloud's
...re sunlight could be provided from the clouds sunshine reflections
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, if, may, moreover, second, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 7.30242825607 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 22.412803532 89% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 30.3222958057 96% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1152.0 1373.03311258 84% => OK
No of words: 218.0 270.72406181 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28440366972 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84250218741 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58482880566 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 145.348785872 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.536697247706 0.540411800872 99% => OK
syllable_count: 356.4 419.366225166 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 55.2736067001 49.2860985944 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.6153846154 110.228320801 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.7692307692 21.698381199 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.15384615385 7.06452816374 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.125261955174 0.272083759551 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.046121043 0.0996497079465 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0424936080481 0.0662205650399 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0780294809892 0.162205337803 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0252517354478 0.0443174109184 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.3589403974 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 53.8541721854 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.2367328918 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 63.6247240618 85% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.7273730684 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.