Moai of Easter Island
The reading and listening are both about “Moai of Easter Island” which they are monolithic statues of human portraits. The author of the reading believes that the construction of these statuses are the reason of collapsing Easter Island. The lecturer challenges the statements made by author. She is of the opinion that none of these reasons is correct.
First of all, the author claims that moving the statues from carved point to the main spot is done by tracks made from Island trees. This argument is challenged by the lecturer. She says that according to the research, a team of a dozen men replaced the statues with walking toward the desired point. So the author claim in this case is incorrect.
Secondly, the writer contends that the construction work completed for about several centuries. Therefor, it caused deforestation that had negative effects on the Island. The lecturer, however, rebuts this by asserting that construction was not the reason of the deforestation, the main reason of this were rats brought by boots that people of the Island first reached there. He elaborates on this by mentioning that palm seeds were eaten by rats so this caused no trees grew in the Island.
Finally, it is states in the article population declined as a result of claimed reason indicated in above paragraph. The author establishes that when Europeans explored the Island in the 18 century, the population of the Island had decreased to 2000 persons. The lecturer, on the other hand, posits that when the Europeans first reached Island, the Island population of 2000 persons was the largest ever.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 249, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...the reason of collapsing Easter Island. The lecturer challenges the statements made...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, second, secondly, so, as a result, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 7.30242825607 14% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 22.412803532 112% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 30.3222958057 132% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1355.0 1373.03311258 99% => OK
No of words: 267.0 270.72406181 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07490636704 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69266250073 2.5805825403 104% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 145.348785872 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.524344569288 0.540411800872 97% => OK
syllable_count: 402.3 419.366225166 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 12.0 8.23620309051 146% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.8037381545 49.2860985944 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.3333333333 110.228320801 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8 21.698381199 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.4 7.06452816374 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.282180353618 0.272083759551 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0814558775812 0.0996497079465 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0968861725147 0.0662205650399 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156661992848 0.162205337803 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0960470331204 0.0443174109184 217% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.3589403974 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 53.8541721854 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.0289183223 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.83 12.2367328918 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.42419426049 102% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 63.6247240618 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.