No till farming
The passage discusses that plowing improves agriculture in many ways, such as higher crop yield, enhancing the soil quality, and reducing the production cost. However, the professor undermines the arguments in the passage by highlighting the cons of plow-dependent farming.
First of all, the high crop yield should be sustainable. Overrunning the farming land capacity may end in unproductive soil. Thus the annual yield figures start to plunge down after a while.This weakens the point made by the passage about the positive influence of plowing in higher productivity of modern agriculture.
Second, the plowing leads the soil to be more prone to water and wind wear. It turns over the surface ground and exposes it to the drying effect of wind. Moreover, removing the plants remaining from the surface results in lower ability of preserving water. This annul the passage claims that plowing is a potent soil quality enhancer.
Finally, according to the professor's account, no-till farming reduces the amount of fuel consumption by 50% and the amount of man work by 30 to 50%. This is in complete contrast to the passage that believes plowing helps the farmer to spend a lesser amount of energy and money, compared to conventional farming methods.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 126, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
... capacity may end in unproductive soil. Thus the annual yield figures start to plung...
^^^^
Line 3, column 191, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: This
...ures start to plunge down after a while.This weakens the point made by the passage a...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, may, moreover, second, so, thus, while, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 10.4613686534 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 12.0772626932 25% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 8.0 22.412803532 36% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 30.3222958057 112% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1059.0 1373.03311258 77% => OK
No of words: 203.0 270.72406181 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21674876847 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77462671648 4.04702891845 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74854776027 2.5805825403 107% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 145.348785872 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.615763546798 0.540411800872 114% => OK
syllable_count: 316.8 419.366225166 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 4.0 8.23620309051 49% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.1449456274 49.2860985944 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.2727272727 110.228320801 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4545454545 21.698381199 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.81818181818 7.06452816374 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.134394656634 0.272083759551 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0431244745707 0.0996497079465 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0837583901592 0.0662205650399 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0768443157039 0.162205337803 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.105783926014 0.0443174109184 239% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.3589403974 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.8541721854 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.2367328918 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.27 8.42419426049 110% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 63.6247240618 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.