ntegrated essay suggested in TPO 8
The reading explains about the famous Chevalier memoir and it also highlights some criticisms that Chevalier exaggerated in writing the memoir and bragged about his achievements. However, the lecturer refutes all the three reasons of the passage and clarifies the accuracy of Chevalier memoir.
First, according to the lecture, borrowing and loan do not mean that Chevalier was poor because evidence has revealed that he had specific properties and he spent most of his time partying and gambling. But he did not have any cash to pay, so it coerced him to borrow money from merchants until he could sell his properties in order to receive cash. On the contrary, the reading explains that since a noticeable amount of money was borrowed from Swiss traders, it is obvious that poverty is the reason that made Chevalier to ask for loan.
Second, on the basis of the passage, Chevalier claims to have conversation with Voltaire who was a well-known author. However, it sounds skeptical that the exact and precise phrases and statements were used in the memoir because after all these years, it would be forgotten. Conversely, the speaker highlights that there are some clear evidence that prove this claim that Chevalier used to write about the meeting and the conversation that occurred between him and Voltaire every night and all of these notes would be used while writing the memoir; according to which all the skeptics about this claim will be wiped out.
Third, the professor clarifies this point that Chevalier did not escape from the prison with the help of his influential friends and connection. According to the lecture, the rest of the prisoners had more influential and powerful connections everywhere and he poses the question that in such circumstance they would have the chance to bribe their friends in order to get rid of the prison. What’s more, there is some evidence that shows that after his escape, the ceiling of the prison was being repaired which exactly prove the point that Chevalier escaped from the prison himself. On the contrary, the reading provides some counterarguments that emphasize the bribery aspect of his escape.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, first, however, if, second, so, third, well, while, after all, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 7.30242825607 205% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 20.0 12.0772626932 166% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 22.412803532 192% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 30.3222958057 152% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1811.0 1373.03311258 132% => OK
No of words: 356.0 270.72406181 131% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08707865169 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34372677135 4.04702891845 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61331986699 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 145.348785872 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.502808988764 0.540411800872 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 545.4 419.366225166 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 29.0 21.2450331126 137% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 63.766936748 49.2860985944 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 150.916666667 110.228320801 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.6666666667 21.698381199 137% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.41666666667 7.06452816374 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 13.3589403974 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.5 53.8541721854 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.0289183223 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 12.2367328918 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 63.6247240618 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.498013245 130% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.