The reading passage elucidates the origin of Nutria and its widespread across the ecosystem. It also describes it as an annoying pest and several measures can be implemented to remove them. However, the lecturer refutes the claims made in the passage. Let us look into the claims and understand why the lecturer disagrees with them.
Firstly, the passage recommends to install strong fences and walls made out of metals or similar hard materials because nutrias cannot chew off them like it chews off wooden or Styrofoam structures and also mentions that it include low maintanence fee. In contrary, the lecturer refuses to accept the claim because nutrias known for its notorious behaviour of digging underground which makes the fences ineffective allowing them to enter the protected areas. Because of the security breach, the lecturer feels the measures may not succeed.
Secondly, it is suggested to dry up the drainage and use the water for farming since nutrias finds the water as an enticing place to habitat. But the lecturer does not agree with it because not all places involves farming and in places like that it cannot be applied. Eventhough we do dry up the drainage, we cannot afford to water the crops when it needs them. Since this measure hardening the process of human life, the lecturer does not encourage it.
Lastly, the passage states that nutrias are suitable for food claiming that they are rich in nutrients and do have surplus amount of proteins. Compared to beef which has 17 grams of protein per 100 grams, nutrias contain an average of 22 grams. The lecturer agrees with the fact but the lecturer is more worried about the health hazards it brings on the humans. They are known to contain bacteria and parasites which is not salubrious for humans. Also, they do contain pathaogesn which cause diseases like tuberculosis and more. They may also cause rashes, fever, weight loss, etc. As consumption of nutrias poses a threat on health, the lecturer discourage it.
These are the reasons why the lecturer's argument is not in line with the claim provided by the passage.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 22, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'recommends installing'.
Suggestion: recommends installing
...rees with them. Firstly, the passage recommends to install strong fences and walls made out of met...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 31, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'lecturers'' or 'lecturer's'?
Suggestion: lecturers'; lecturer's
...ge it. These are the reasons why the lecturers argument is not in line with the claim ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, lastly, look, may, second, secondly, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 7.30242825607 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 31.0 22.412803532 138% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 30.3222958057 139% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1756.0 1373.03311258 128% => OK
No of words: 353.0 270.72406181 130% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97450424929 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33454660006 4.04702891845 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46288567349 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 145.348785872 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.549575070822 0.540411800872 102% => OK
syllable_count: 534.6 419.366225166 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 13.0662251656 145% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.4422232082 49.2860985944 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.4210526316 110.228320801 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5789473684 21.698381199 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.15789473684 7.06452816374 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 4.45695364238 179% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0863593017567 0.272083759551 32% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0277626851831 0.0996497079465 28% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0309650311023 0.0662205650399 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.046684136468 0.162205337803 29% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0313034186317 0.0443174109184 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.3589403974 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 53.8541721854 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.2367328918 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 63.6247240618 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.