posibily of living on Venus
The reading and the listening are both about whether or not humans can stay on Venus permanently. The author feels that due to some problem it is not a practical idea, and can not be executed. The lecturer on the other hand thinks that the mentioned problem could be solved with some changes in the plan.
To begin with, the author posits that the atmospheric pressure at the surface of Venus is so high that could not be managed for humans to land there and stay there. The professor, however, asserts that we can make a floating station 50 km high in the sky of Venus and stay there. At that altitude the atmospheric pressure is merely the same as eath's atmospheric pressure, so the problem would be solved.
Secondly, the author states that since there is not any known water or oxygen on the surface or atmosphere of this planet, if we want to live there, we would need to export these essentials from the earth, which is not doable. The professor provides a solution to this problem. He points out that since there are sulfuric acid and carbon dioxide in the atmosphere, we can easily make water and oxygen out of these chemicals.
Finally, the author claims that because of the thick cloud layer and the carbon dioxide below it there is a serious lack of light on the surface, for making electricity in order to power our equipment. The professor goes on to say that, at the floating station's altitude, there is still a considerable amount of sunlight that has not gone through the clouds. Moreover, the layer of carbon dioxide that is below the station, would reflect some of the light back to the position of the station. If we place our solar power cell in the way that they could catch both the reflected light from the layer of carbon dioxide and the light that comes from the sum the electrical energy made would be more than enough.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-03-06 | mojan izadkhah | 3 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Overall the widespread use of the internet has a mostly positive effect on life in today s world Use reasons and details to support your opinion 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement it is more important for governments to spend money into internet access than to improve public transprtation 52
- Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are now 70
- tpo 52 75
- team work 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 46, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
...eading and the listening are both about whether or not humans can stay on Venus permanently. T...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 194, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ractical idea, and can not be executed. The lecturer on the other hand thinks that ...
^^^
Line 7, column 254, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'stations'' or 'station's'?
Suggestion: stations'; station's
...or goes on to say that, at the floating stations altitude, there is still a considerable...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 439, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...hat is below the station, would reflect some of the light back to the position of the stati...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 5.04856512141 238% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 22.412803532 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 30.3222958057 148% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1522.0 1373.03311258 111% => OK
No of words: 333.0 270.72406181 123% => OK
Chars per words: 4.57057057057 5.08290768461 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27180144563 4.04702891845 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.3306631136 2.5805825403 90% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 145.348785872 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.483483483483 0.540411800872 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 468.9 419.366225166 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 21.2450331126 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.2421861762 49.2860985944 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.076923077 110.228320801 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6153846154 21.698381199 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.15384615385 7.06452816374 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0670616418209 0.272083759551 25% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0248447490275 0.0996497079465 25% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0382551517924 0.0662205650399 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0417498532282 0.162205337803 26% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0278514604527 0.0443174109184 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.3589403974 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 53.8541721854 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.52 12.2367328918 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.82 8.42419426049 93% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 63.6247240618 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.498013245 114% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.