First, the article states that promise of incentives improves employee attitudes. However, the professor refutes this point by saying that controlled study shows that people want to be paid with respect and not with incentives. Professor explains that people interpret that incentive is a way for an enterprise to manipulate and control the employees.
Second, the argument posits that productivity increases when incentive comes into play. However, the professor states that incentive leads to less productivity. According to the professor, the disappointment of not getting a reward is equivalent to punishment for an employee. Consequently, reduces the motivation and the productivity of the employee.
Third, the professor says that rewards reduce the amount of quality work. The professor explains this by saying that the partnership between the supervisor and his subordinates weakens because a worker would conceal problems and mistakes from the supervisor to avoid negative rating which in turn would lead to no reward.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, however, second, so, third
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 10.4613686534 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 22.412803532 54% => OK
Preposition: 19.0 30.3222958057 63% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 879.0 1373.03311258 64% => OK
No of words: 155.0 270.72406181 57% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.67096774194 5.08290768461 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52844152537 4.04702891845 87% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00380611836 2.5805825403 116% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 145.348785872 65% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.612903225806 0.540411800872 113% => OK
syllable_count: 264.6 419.366225166 63% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 53.3187480056 49.2860985944 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.6666666667 110.228320801 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2222222222 21.698381199 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.22222222222 7.06452816374 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.09492273731 73% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186680747493 0.272083759551 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.076347091246 0.0996497079465 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0740419631428 0.0662205650399 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124047514827 0.162205337803 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.100587986543 0.0443174109184 227% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.3589403974 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 53.8541721854 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.31 12.2367328918 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.37 8.42419426049 111% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 63.6247240618 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted. The correct pattern:
para 1: introduction
para 2: doubt 1
para 3: doubt 2
para 4: doubt 3
Less contents wanted from the reading passages(25%), more content wanted from the lecture (75%).
Don't need a conclusion paragraph.
Read sample essays from ETS:
http://www.testbig.com/users/toeflwritingmaster
More content wanted.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.