Indeed professors have good knowledge over certain scintific concepts and people might get benefited from that. According to the speaker, however this is not a good thing for the professor, the university, and prople watching it. Following are the reasons provided by the speaker.
Firstly, she argues by that no one is really getting benefit from professors commentory on scientific research on television. She explains by saying that from a professional point of view, professor delivering talk on T.V is considered inferior to the other professors and also, scintific community does not invite them for an important meetings. Celebrity professor rather considered to be a entertainor. For this resons they also face difficulty getting funds for research.
Moreover, Professor going on a media platform is also not bringing reputation for the university. Professor wastes his/her time on preparing talk for T.V. In addition, they do care about how they are looking and wast time to get ready. Instead of doing research for the university, this is costing bith students and university.
Lastly, Speaker talks about general public, she says that T.V networks dont want in in depth knowledge of the subject but the acedamic title. she says that any anchor who have done some homework can do that job since the talk is superficial. Thus, general people also not getting much out of the T.V talk.
To summerize this, Speaker gives a myriad of reason to argue that no one is really getting benefits.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Indeed,
Indeed professors have good knowledge over cer...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 221, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: V
...of view, professor delivering talk on T.V is considered inferior to the other pro...
^
Line 3, column 338, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'meeting'?
Suggestion: meeting
...y does not invite them for an important meetings. Celebrity professor rather considered ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 392, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...brity professor rather considered to be a entertainor. For this resons they also ...
^
Line 7, column 29, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...versity. Lastly, Speaker talks about general public, she says that T.V networks dont want i...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 61, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: V
...s about general public, she says that T.V networks dont want in in depth knowledg...
^
Line 7, column 72, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...eral public, she says that T.V networks dont want in in depth knowledge of the subje...
^^^^
Line 7, column 82, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: in
...c, she says that T.V networks dont want in in depth knowledge of the subject but the ...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 143, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: She
... of the subject but the acedamic title. she says that any anchor who have done some...
^^^
Line 7, column 299, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: V
...ople also not getting much out of the T.V talk. To summerize this, Speaker giv...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, lastly, look, moreover, really, so, thus, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 30.3222958057 96% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1264.0 1373.03311258 92% => OK
No of words: 244.0 270.72406181 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18032786885 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95227774224 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71968151858 2.5805825403 105% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 145.348785872 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594262295082 0.540411800872 110% => OK
syllable_count: 383.4 419.366225166 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 1.0 8.23620309051 12% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.0335143252 49.2860985944 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.2857142857 110.228320801 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4285714286 21.698381199 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.64285714286 7.06452816374 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 4.19205298013 239% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.122502368721 0.272083759551 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0458075491257 0.0996497079465 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0278810849128 0.0662205650399 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0655003762055 0.162205337803 40% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0390437445956 0.0443174109184 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.3589403974 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 53.8541721854 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.2367328918 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.42419426049 103% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 63.6247240618 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.7273730684 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.