Indeed professors have good knowledge of certain scientific concepts and people might get benefited from that. According to the speaker, however, this is not a good thing for the professor, the university, and the people watching it. The following are the reasons provided by the speaker.
Firstly, she argues by that no one is really getting benefits from professors' commentary on scientific research on television. She explains by saying that from a professional point of view, professors delivering a talk on T.V is considered inferior to the other professors, and also, the scientific community does not invite them to important meetings. Celebrity professors rather considered an entertainer. For this reason, they also face difficulty getting funds for research.
Moreover, professors going on a media platform is also not bringing a reputation for the university. Professor wastes his/her time on preparing a talk for T.V. In addition, they do care about how they are looking and waste time getting ready. Instead of doing research for the university, this is costing both students and the university.
Lastly, Speaker talks about the general public, she says that T.V networks don't want in-depth knowledge of the subject but the academic title. she says that any anchor who has done some homework can do that job since the talk is superficial. Thus, general people also not getting much out of the T.V talk.
To summarize this, Speaker gives a myriad of reasons to argue that no one is really getting benefits.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Indeed,
Indeed professors have good knowledge of certa...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 225, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: V
...view, professors delivering a talk on T.V is considered inferior to the other pro...
^
Line 7, column 33, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...ity. Lastly, Speaker talks about the general public, she says that T.V networks dont want i...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 65, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: V
...out the general public, she says that T.V networks dont want in-depth knowledge o...
^
Line 7, column 76, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...eral public, she says that T.V networks dont want in-depth knowledge of the subject ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 144, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: She
... of the subject but the academic title. she says that any anchor who has done some ...
^^^
Line 7, column 299, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: V
...ople also not getting much out of the T.V talk. To summarize this, Speaker giv...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, lastly, look, moreover, really, so, thus, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 30.3222958057 89% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1285.0 1373.03311258 94% => OK
No of words: 246.0 270.72406181 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22357723577 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96035189615 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78265320046 2.5805825403 108% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 145.348785872 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577235772358 0.540411800872 107% => OK
syllable_count: 386.1 419.366225166 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 3.25607064018 246% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 8.23620309051 36% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.2041310383 49.2860985944 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.7857142857 110.228320801 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5714285714 21.698381199 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.64285714286 7.06452816374 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 4.19205298013 167% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.119327135538 0.272083759551 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0446281962733 0.0996497079465 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0293399080469 0.0662205650399 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0633830853152 0.162205337803 39% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0423482239807 0.0443174109184 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.3589403974 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 53.8541721854 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.7 12.2367328918 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.42419426049 102% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 63.6247240618 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.7273730684 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.