PROVIDING A NATIONAL SYSTEM IN A COUNTRY WHERE THE UNEMPLOYED RECEIVE A REGULAR PAYMENT ONLY ENCOURAGES PEOPLE NOT TO SEEK WORK AND PUTS AN UNREASONABLE STRAIN ON A COUNTRY'S FINANCIAL RESOURCES. DISCUSS THIS STATEMENTAND GIVE YOUR OPINION?
Millions have lost their jobs around the world and the governments are faced with the economic downturn. With the increase in the number of people claiming unemployment benefits the burden on most country’s budgets has risen. In my opinion, despite the financial pressure on the governments, employed citizens receiving regular sum may be beneficial. The following paragraphs will discuss benefits of supporting unemployed with the payments with relevant examples.
Firstly, people are often unemployed due to lack of education and live below the poverty line. It becomes critical for governments to support the impoverished and aid them for basic survival else people may consider crime. For example, in India, when the Delhi state government reduced payments to poor, there was a record increase in crime. Hence, allocated budgets to assist the needy with payments to support their livelihood is extremely important.
Secondly, losing a job can be extremely stressful for the entire family, often leads to emotional disbalance. Many are not equipped to handle sudden financial stress; some even attempt suicide. As tax paying citizens a support from the government may be comforting. For instance, during the COVID 19 pandemic, retail jobs were gone over night, with job loss at such levels finding another was impossible for most people. The relief payments for $2,500/- initiated by the Canada was an exemplary effort to support its citizens who lost jobs during the COVID crisis.
Summarize and Opinion: In conclusion, the governments in most countries have regulations and budgeted provisions for provide for the unemployed. If authorities provide support by offering free training programs designed to fill the job gaps in addition to mere compensation to the jobless, it could be the beginning of a new spectrum of multi-skilled society.
- PROVIDING A NATIONAL SYSTEM IN A COUNTRY WHERE THE UNEMPLOYED RECEIVE A REGULAR PAYMENT ONLY ENCOURAGES PEOPLE NOT TO SEEK WORK AND PUTS AN UNREASONABLE STRAIN ON A COUNTRY S FINANCIAL RESOURCES DISCUSS THIS STATEMENTAND GIVE YOUR OPINION 56
- You will move to Toronto for work You know some people who live there Ask them for help finding accommodation Tell them where you would like to live Tell them the type of place you are looking for 73
- PROVIDING A NATIONAL SYSTEM IN A COUNTRY WHERE THE UNEMPLOYED RECEIVE A REGULAR PAYMENT ONLY ENCOURAGES PEOPLE NOT TO SEEK WORK AND PUTS AN UNREASONABLE STRAIN ON A COUNTRY S FINANCIAL RESOURCES DISCUSS THIS STATEMENTAND GIVE YOUR OPINION 90
- You will move to Toronto for work You know some people who live there Ask them for help finding accommodation Tell them where you would like to live Tell them the type of place you are looking for 73
- Doing an enjoyable activity with a child can develop better skills and more creativity than reading To what extent do you agree Use reasons and specific examples to explain your answer 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 195, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...cial stress; some even attempt suicide. As tax paying citizens a support from the ...
^^^
Line 3, column 447, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...for most people. The relief payments for ,500/- initiated by the Canada was an exe...
^^
Line 4, column 360, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... new spectrum of multi-skilled society.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, hence, if, may, second, secondly, so, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 12.0772626932 17% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 7.0 22.412803532 31% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 30.3222958057 132% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1561.0 1373.03311258 114% => OK
No of words: 288.0 270.72406181 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.42013888889 5.08290768461 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83399493569 2.5805825403 110% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 145.348785872 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.618055555556 0.540411800872 114% => OK
syllable_count: 480.6 419.366225166 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 3.0 8.23620309051 36% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.6616322651 49.2860985944 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.066666667 110.228320801 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2 21.698381199 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.13333333333 7.06452816374 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 4.45695364238 202% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.119459127385 0.272083759551 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0435565764969 0.0996497079465 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0413659479928 0.0662205650399 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.079306401132 0.162205337803 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0447949924611 0.0443174109184 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.3589403974 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 53.8541721854 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.2367328918 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.79 8.42419426049 116% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 63.6247240618 149% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.