The reading and lecture are both about the Brachiosaurus' habitat. The author of the reading states that Brachiosaurus lived in water. However, the lecturers dispute the author's arguments, and she is of the opinion that this particular dinosaur lived on land.
To begin with, the author believes that Brachiosaurus couldn't stand on land as their short legs were unable to suppose their weight. The lecturer disagree that point by claiming that there was fossil evidences of Brachiosaurus' footprints on land. The evidences show that some sauropods walked on land with four feet.
Secondly, the reading states that Brachiosaurus' neck couldn't reach trees due to the weight of its head. In contrast, the lecturer refutes this by mentioning that Brachiosaurus could easily feed on land plants, and lift its neck like a giraffe. In addition, she points out there are plenty of plants at its body height, even if it could only reach out its neck horizontally.
Finally, the author claims that Brachiosaurus' nostrils are located at the top of its head, which means that it could breathe like swimmers' snorkels. The lecturer dismisses that point. She cites the evidence of bone fossils indicating that these dinosaurs had narrow feet, like elephants, which are unfit to live in water.
xxx
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 373, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: there's
...m sinking in water just like hippo, but theres no presence of such feet in Brachiosaur...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, if, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, whereas, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 22.412803532 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 30.3222958057 132% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1395.0 1373.03311258 102% => OK
No of words: 278.0 270.72406181 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01798561151 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75421439073 2.5805825403 107% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 145.348785872 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.593525179856 0.540411800872 110% => OK
syllable_count: 415.8 419.366225166 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.9441822326 49.2860985944 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 107.307692308 110.228320801 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3846153846 21.698381199 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.53846153846 7.06452816374 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.27373068433 187% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.235727819129 0.272083759551 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0829505270575 0.0996497079465 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0656186619709 0.0662205650399 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149875514174 0.162205337803 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0754775741423 0.0443174109184 170% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.3589403974 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 53.8541721854 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.2367328918 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 63.6247240618 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.7273730684 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.