The reading passage and lecture are both about Pterosaurs which were ancient group of winged reptiles that lived together with dinosaurs, and if they were capable of powered flight or just glide. The writer claims several argument to explain that Pterosaurs were able only to glide. However, the lecturer have different ideas. She believes that Pterosaus could be flying by flapping their wings.
First of all, the author states, modren reptiles are cold- blooded. Ancient reptile also cold -blooded. Moreover, cold -blooded animals have low metabolism, therefore, they do not have enouph energy to fly. This statement is challenged by professor. She elaborates on thich like hair which cover skin of Pterosaurs, this cover keep these reptile warm and made enable them to have energy to use their wing to fly like warm-blooded animals.
Furthermore, the passage asserts, heavy body wieght of ancient reptile prevent them from flap their wings fast and fly. The speaker refutes this argument. She mentions, these type of reptiles had specific skeloton feature that help them to fly. She says, bones of ptersaurs are hallow. Therefore, they had light weight that enable them fly.
Ultimately, the author contends, pterosaurs can not able to jump and take of ground, because their back legs muscles were very weak. The lecturer in the other hand claims, birds only rely on two legs to run and take off the ground. But, ancient reptiles had four legs which enable them to jump and fly.
The reading passage and lecture are both about Pterosaurs which were ancient group of winged reptiles that lived together with dinosaurs, and if they were capable of powered flight or just glide. The writer claims several argument to explain that Pterosaurs were able only to glide. However, the lecturer have different ideas. She believes that Pterosaus could be flying by flapping their wings.
First of all, the author states, modren reptiles are cold- blooded. Ancient reptile also cold -blooded. Moreover, cold -blooded animals have low metabolism, therefore, they do not have enouph energy to fly. This statement is challenged by professor. She elaborates on thich like hair which cover skin of Pterosaurs, this cover keep these reptile warm and made enable them to have energy to use their winge to fly like warm-blooded animals.
Furthermore, the passage asserts, heavy body wieght of ancient reptile prevent them from flap their wings fast and fly. The speaker refutes this argument. She mentions, these type of reptiles had specific skeloton feature that help them to fly. She says, bones of ptersaurs are hallow. Therefore, they had light weight that enable them fly.
Ultimately, the author contends, pterosaurs can not able to jump and take of ground, because their back legs muscles were very weak. The lecturer in the other hand claims, birds only rely on two legs to run and take off the ground. But, ancient reptiles had four legs which enable them to jump and fly.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 216, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun argument seems to be countable; consider using: 'several arguments'.
Suggestion: several arguments
...flight or just glide. The writer claims several argument to explain that Pterosaurs were able on...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 90, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ght of ancient reptile prevent them from flap their wings fast and fly. The speak...
^^
Line 3, column 280, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'hallowed'.
Suggestion: hallowed
...o fly. She says, bones of ptersaurs are hallow. Therefore, they had light weight that ...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 308, Rule ID: LIGHT_WEIGHT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'lightweight'?
Suggestion: lightweight
...ersaurs are hallow. Therefore, they had light weight that enable them fly. Ultimately, the...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 22.412803532 116% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1242.0 1373.03311258 90% => OK
No of words: 244.0 270.72406181 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09016393443 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95227774224 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.32321747258 2.5805825403 90% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 145.348785872 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.606557377049 0.540411800872 112% => OK
syllable_count: 374.4 419.366225166 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 3.25607064018 276% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 21.2450331126 66% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 48.1063556434 49.2860985944 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 73.0588235294 110.228320801 66% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.3529411765 21.698381199 66% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.76470588235 7.06452816374 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.374993305447 0.272083759551 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107837994259 0.0996497079465 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.192212458714 0.0662205650399 290% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.244828060371 0.162205337803 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.271864625122 0.0443174109184 613% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 13.3589403974 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.73 53.8541721854 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 11.0289183223 69% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.65 12.2367328918 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.42419426049 95% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 63.6247240618 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.7273730684 51% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.498013245 72% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 68.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.