The reading passage and the lecture talk about type of sound called quakers that heard by submarines in Russia in 1960. The writer claims several theories to explain the sources of this sound. The lecturer casts doubt on claim made in article. She mentions, quackers is a strange phenomnen, and all theories which are mention in passage are not convincing.
To begin with, the author states, the sound occur by ocra whale. Ocra male use this sound to call femal ocra during a countership ritual. This statement is contradictes by professor. She illustrates, ocra live in surface of ocean. And submarines presented sound in deep ocean. Therefore, the idea that ocra made this sound is unlikely.
Second, the writer says, the sound were caused by gaint squids. sonar can not detect them since their body are made from soft tissue that this devce can not detect them. The professor refutes this notion. She elaborates, submarines heard this sound in 1960, but, thid sound disapper in 1980. Moreover, if squids cause this sound, whey they stop doing it and them return back to do it. As a result, this evidence is also not true.
Finally, the author asserts, this sound is from military technology. Submarine secretly patroling the area. The professor rebuts this point. She says, submarines move around and change their driction very fast. this can not be happened with military marines since, they can not move fast. son this explanation in passage also incorrect.
The reading passage and the lecture talk about type of sound called quakers that heard by submarines in Russia in 1960. The writer claims several theories to explain the sources of this sound. The lecturer casts doubt on claim made in article. She mentions, quackers is a strange phenomnen, and all theories which are mention in passage are not convincing.
To begin with, the author states, the sound occur by ocra whale. Ocra male use this sound to call femal ocra during a countership ritual. This statement is contradictes by professor. She illustrates, ocra live in surface of ocean. And submarines presented sound in deep ocean. Therefore, the idea that ocra made this sound is unlikely.
Second, the writer says, the sound were caused by gaint squids. sonar can not detect them since their body are made from soft tissue that this devce can not detect them. The professor refutes this notion. She elaborates, submarines heard this sound in 1960, but, thid sound disapper in 1980. Moreover, if squids cause this sound, whey they stop doing it and them return back to do it. As a result, this evidence is also not true.
Finally, the author asserts, this sound is from military technology. Submarine secretly patroling the area. The professor rebuts this point. She says, submarines move around and change their deriction very fast. this can not be happened with military marines since, they can not move fast. son this explanation in passage also incorrect.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-08-16 | talelaldabous | 60 | view |
- The reading passage and lecture are both talking about declination of liiterature reader in these days The passage claims there are several negative effect by reducing in reading literature The lecturer in the other hand casts dout in claim made in articl 71
- Skip to main content Independent Writing Question 1 00 00 Directions You have 30 minutes to plan and write your response Typically an effective response will be 300 words at least Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more important 70
- The reading passage and the lecture are both talking about lit it burn policy like yellow stone fire which occur in United State which is mean not to suppress natural fires of forest The writer claims three kinds of damaged caused by the let it burn Howev 60
- The readind passage and lecture are both about whether dinosaurs wa s endothermal reptiles or not The writers claims three evidences that dinosaurs were enotherms The lecturer casts doubt on claim made in article She mentions all evidence which are mentio 65
- The reading and iectyre about P ramorum which is a type fungus called phytophythora These fungus infect trees and cause damage to them The auther believes thats wayes to protect the tree frome these species the lecturer casts doubt on the claims made in t 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The reading passage and the lecture talk...
^^
Line 1, column 196, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...s to explain the sources of this sound. The lecturer casts doubt on claim made in a...
^^^
Line 3, column 65, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Sonar
... the sound were caused by gaint squids. sonar can not detect them since their body ar...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 364, Rule ID: RETURN_BACK[1]
Message: Use simply 'return'.
Suggestion: return
...sound, whey they stop doing it and them return back to do it. As a result, this evidence is...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 213, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...d and change their deriction very fast. this can not be happened with military marin...
^^^^
Line 4, column 291, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Son
... marines since, they can not move fast. son this explanation in passage also incorr...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, if, moreover, second, so, therefore, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 12.0772626932 33% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 29.0 22.412803532 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1222.0 1373.03311258 89% => OK
No of words: 245.0 270.72406181 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98775510204 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95632099841 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38761206619 2.5805825403 93% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 145.348785872 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587755102041 0.540411800872 109% => OK
syllable_count: 366.3 419.366225166 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 3.25607064018 276% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 13.0662251656 168% => OK
Sentence length: 11.0 21.2450331126 52% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.4534048399 49.2860985944 50% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 55.5454545455 110.228320801 50% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 11.1363636364 21.698381199 51% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 3.77272727273 7.06452816374 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 4.19205298013 143% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 4.33554083885 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 18.0 4.27373068433 421% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.483074217544 0.272083759551 178% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.135140324337 0.0996497079465 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.146863265826 0.0662205650399 222% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.322548164156 0.162205337803 199% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.278874285003 0.0443174109184 629% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.6 13.3589403974 57% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.77 53.8541721854 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 11.0289183223 58% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 10.48 12.2367328918 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.92 8.42419426049 94% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 63.6247240618 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.7273730684 51% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.4 10.498013245 61% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.