The reading passage and the lecturer are both discussing dedicated to uncovering and studying old culture artifacts in The United Kingdom. The writer claims serious problems and limitations in Britain to study these artifacts. However, the lecturer casts doubt on claim made in article. She points out three newguid line to manage archiology.
To begin with, the author states, valuable artifacts was lost by doing contruction works. As aresult of increase in Britain population, many cities, towns and villages were built. these building destructed these artifacts. This statement is challenged by lecturer. She mentions, before doing any construction, area should be examined by archeologists, they investigate area and, if there are any artifacts, they will carry them and preserve them before construction proceed.
Second, the author asserts, financial support for archaeologists was adequate. The government change their priorities brought about periodic reduction infunding. The professor refutes this notion. She contends, process of finding artifacts is paid by construction companies not by government. These companies brought out by financial plans. companies support the searching process and preseveing of these artifacts.
Finally, the author mention, there is no a good oppotunity to find a perfect jobs or careers in universities or government agenices. The lecturer rebuts this point. She states. Government put a new quid line to provide many jobs in this field. they provide work to examine and preserve artifacts. In addition, processing data. Therefore increase in jobs in archeological field.
The reading passage and the lecturer are both discussing dedicated to uncovering and studying old culture artifacts in The United Kingdom. The writer claims serious problems and limitations in Britain to study these artifacts. However, the lecturer casts doubt on claim made in article. She points out three newguid line to manage archiology.
To begin with, the author states, valuble artifacts was lost by doing contruction works. As aresult of increase in Britain population, many cities, towns and villages were built. these building destructed these artifacts. This statement is challenged by lecturer. She mentions, before doing any construction, area should be examined by archiologists, they investigate area and, if there are any artifacts, they will carry them and preserve them before contruction proceed.
Second, the author asserts, financial support for archaeologists was adequate. The governmont change their priorites brought about periodic reduction infunding. The professor refutes this notion. She contends, process of finding artifacts is paid by construction companies not by government. These companies brought out by financial plans. companies support the searching process and preseveing of these artifacts.
Finally, the author mention, there is no a good appotunity to find a perfect jobs or careers in universities or government agenices. The lecturer rebuts this point. She states. Government put a new guid line to provide many jobs in this field. they provide work to examine and preserve artifacts. In addition, processing data. Therefore increase in jobs in archeological field.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The reading passage and the lecturer are...
^^
Line 1, column 59, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...age and the lecturer are both discussing dedicated to uncovering and studying old...
^^
Line 1, column 327, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...le. She points out three newguid line to manage archiology. To begin with, the ...
^^
Line 2, column 180, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: These
... cities, towns and villages were built. these building destructed these artifacts. Th...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 341, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Companies
...mpanies brought out by financial plans. companies support the searching process and prese...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 40, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
... Finally, the author mention, there is no a good appotunity to find a perfect job...
^^
Line 4, column 245, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: They
...ine to provide many jobs in this field. they provide work to examine and preserve ar...
^^^^
Line 4, column 328, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...rtifacts. In addition, processing data. Therefore increase in jobs in archeological field...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, however, if, second, so, therefore, in addition, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 12.0772626932 0% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 30.3222958057 106% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.01324503311 239% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1375.0 1373.03311258 100% => OK
No of words: 240.0 270.72406181 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.72916666667 5.08290768461 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93597934253 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95803695698 2.5805825403 115% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 145.348785872 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.625 0.540411800872 116% => OK
syllable_count: 414.9 419.366225166 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 3.25607064018 307% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 13.0662251656 161% => OK
Sentence length: 11.0 21.2450331126 52% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.9216324122 49.2860985944 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 65.4761904762 110.228320801 59% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 11.4285714286 21.698381199 53% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 3.61904761905 7.06452816374 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 4.19205298013 191% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.27373068433 257% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.281330908696 0.272083759551 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0746645798712 0.0996497079465 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.159025042987 0.0662205650399 240% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.19911069329 0.162205337803 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.270386195007 0.0443174109184 610% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.3589403974 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.85 53.8541721854 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 11.0289183223 80% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.77 12.2367328918 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.45 8.42419426049 112% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 63.6247240618 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.0 10.7273730684 47% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.4 10.498013245 61% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 68.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.