The reading suggests that the photographic negatives stored in envelopes were made by Ansel Adams, a famous landscape photographer, while the lecturer refutes that they might be made by someone else and points out the inaccuracies of each point presented in the passage.
To begin with, the professor opposes the reading content that part of the negatives include images that Adams has photographed, for example, a large pine tree. He maintains that the tree was not chosen randomly. It was inside a famous national park and was the most visited site of the park. Since almost every person visited there, it was inconclusive to say that it was Adams who created the negatives of this tree.
In the second place, the passage claims that the addressed on the envelopes of the negatives suggests similar handwriting of Adam's wife, who is considered to have assisted her husband's work. However, the professor rebuts that some of the place names were not even spelled correctly, which could hardly be possible as Adam's wife grew up there and was supposed to be familiar with that.
Finally, the reading points out that a fire occurred in Adams' studio, which was also reflected in some of the damaged negatives. But the lecturer argues that fires are pretty usual for photographers since they often use flammable chemicals in their studios to print photos. Hence, it was not sufficient to justify the accusation.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 226, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...ork. However, the professor rebuts that some of the place names were not even spelled corre...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 99, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...ams studio, which was also reflected in some of the damaged negatives. But the lecturer arg...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, hence, however, if, second, so, while, for example, to begin with, in the second place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1175.0 1373.03311258 86% => OK
No of words: 235.0 270.72406181 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91531732006 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60755596705 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 145.348785872 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.540411800872 111% => OK
syllable_count: 376.2 419.366225166 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.6671477645 49.2860985944 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.5 110.228320801 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5 21.698381199 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.6 7.06452816374 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.142462963321 0.272083759551 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0496470482785 0.0996497079465 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0494278685816 0.0662205650399 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0892990905595 0.162205337803 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0484249086104 0.0443174109184 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.3589403974 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 53.8541721854 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.0289183223 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 12.2367328918 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.42419426049 104% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 63.6247240618 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.7273730684 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.