silver coin, Maine, united states, Norse, archaeologists, Canadian

Essay topics:

silver coin, Maine, united states, Norse, archaeologists, Canadian

In this set of material, both of the author and the lecturer discuss about European silver coin founded in the state of Maine in the United States. While the author of the reading declares that these coins are not original type of them, and they probably are fake, the professor believes the archaeologists have mistakes on their hypothesis. She says there are a few of reasons refuting their speculations. In what follows, the reasons of both of the author and the professor are discussed.

Firstly, the author of the passage asserts that archaeologists discovered coins far from sites where a Norse presence are documented. On the other hand, the professor thinks other historical objects brought by European have also found far away. She says that native americans could travell this distance, and
they may bring them.

Secondly, the reading acclaims that other coins cannot be found in Canadian sites inhabited by Norse. In contrast, the professor believes there is no necessity. They could back to Europe and turn back. It is completely possible.

Finally, the author declares that the Norse could realize that silver coins are not useful to them. But, the lecturer says Norse knew that they were attractive and valuable. They used beautiful objects, such as jwellery, for trading with each other.

In conclusion, while archaeologists declares that the coins are fake, the professor refutes their viewpoints about them

Votes
Average: 8 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 309, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ericans could travell this distance, and they may bring them. Secondly, the re...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, well, while, in conclusion, in contrast, such as, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 22.412803532 116% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 30.3222958057 86% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1207.0 1373.03311258 88% => OK
No of words: 231.0 270.72406181 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22510822511 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89854898053 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61613017717 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 145.348785872 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.536796536797 0.540411800872 99% => OK
syllable_count: 365.4 419.366225166 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 21.2450331126 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.4796335567 49.2860985944 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.4666666667 110.228320801 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.4 21.698381199 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.93333333333 7.06452816374 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.09492273731 147% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.149845400479 0.272083759551 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0452506353243 0.0996497079465 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0707161480721 0.0662205650399 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0662816080123 0.162205337803 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0461736544464 0.0443174109184 104% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.3589403974 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 53.8541721854 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.2367328918 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.42419426049 96% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 63.6247240618 85% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.498013245 76% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.