Some university teachers prefer to record their lectures before classes. In this way, students will be familiar with the lecture in advance and teachers help students practice in classes while they are watching or listening lectures. Do you think it is an effective way to learn?
The quality of the college education, in some ways, determines the future of a nation and everyone pays a close attention on it. In university, some professors prefer to introduce the topic in the class and then teach students about it in details. However, some other professors tend to record their lecture before class, and give students a chance to learn about it by themselves first. From my perspective, I believe that the latter choice would be more effective way for university education.
Knowing the topic before classes and preparing for it, students might have more possibilities and opportunities to train their self learning ability. Before classes, students would have to gather the information about the topic, which will be discussed in classes, and link their own knowledge to the topic. For example, when I was in the college, my advanced math teachers always give us his recorded lecture before classes and asked us to prepare for it. At first, I find it extreme hard for me, for I did not know how to find the information I would need for the next class and what the relationship between this topic and my own knowledge. However, things had changed after a semester, I gradually formed my own self learning style and when I comes troubles when studying, I have a clear mind about how and where I could find the answers. So, without my math teachers, I will never own my ability to learn by my self.
Besides students, teachers will be benefits from this teaching styles, making full use to time in classes. After giving recorded lecture and asking students prepare for it, teachers will not have to introduce some important but can be easily learned by oneself information during class, thus, they can make full use of time during classes. For a student major in physics, after preparing for the class, he would already understand the importance and historic background of the physics, as a result, during the class, he or her teachers could devoted themselves to teaching students about the important theories of physics and how we can adopt it to the betterment of our society. Also, the precious time during classes could be taken by teachers and students to discussed about more meaningful topics. Therefore, teachers will not have to prepare too much about those unimportant information.
In a words, the recorded lecture should be given to students before students in order to given them the chance to learn by themselves, and to make full use of time during the classes.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 748, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[1]
Message: The pronoun 'I' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'come'
Suggestion: come
...d my own self learning style and when I comes troubles when studying, I have a clear ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 542, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'could' requires the base form of the verb: 'devote'
Suggestion: devote
...ing the class, he or her teachers could devoted themselves to teaching students about t...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 4, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a word' or simply 'words'?
Suggestion: a word; words
...out those unimportant information. In a words, the recorded lecture should be given t...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, however, so, then, therefore, thus, for example, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 5.04856512141 357% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 18.0 7.30242825607 246% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 6.0 12.0772626932 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 47.0 22.412803532 210% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 68.0 30.3222958057 224% => Less preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2076.0 1373.03311258 151% => OK
No of words: 425.0 270.72406181 157% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88470588235 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54043259262 4.04702891845 112% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62919462191 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 145.348785872 136% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.463529411765 0.540411800872 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 646.2 419.366225166 154% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 3.25607064018 276% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 8.23620309051 36% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.25165562914 399% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 2.5761589404 427% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 21.2450331126 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 62.1675847508 49.2860985944 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.75 110.228320801 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5625 21.698381199 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.4375 7.06452816374 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 4.33554083885 208% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.296290407353 0.272083759551 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113324066003 0.0996497079465 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0690659303272 0.0662205650399 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.201280263309 0.162205337803 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0374839039336 0.0443174109184 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.3589403974 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 53.8541721854 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.0289183223 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 12.2367328918 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.01 8.42419426049 95% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 63.6247240618 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.7273730684 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.498013245 118% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.