the specific dinosaur lived in North Slope, Edmontosausus, one hundred million years ago
Both the reading and lecture discuss the specific dinosaur lived in North Slope, Edmontosausus, one hundred million years ago. The passage states that this species of dinosaur had to migrate south to get rid of cold winter of north and be able to survive. It provides three reasons for this claim. The professor argues this idea and denies each reason of reading.
In the first place, the passage mentions that Edmontosausus fed on plant, but the hard condition of north during the winter made difficult growing of plant. The professor, in the contrast, says the Edmontosausus could be able to feed on dead plants because the summer of north was very warmer than now in which the plant can grow a lot and produced a lot of nutrition for Edmontosausus.
Secondly, according to the passage, the evidence of skeletons showed that they lived in herds. It proved that Edmontosausus migrate, in fact they be in a herd to afford the migration. The professor refutes this by explaining that the animals choose to live in the herd because of different reasons, one of them is over protection in encountering with predators. He provides an example of a specific species of animals that live in US and always in the herd, but they don't migrate.
Third, the passages claim that Edmontosausus had the physical ability to migrate long distance, so it isn't inconceivable to think they were able to run in the speed of 45 kilometers per hour, the speed that they had to have to reach north. The professor notes to the juveniles of Edmontosausus all of which hadn't enough growth and physical ability to pass such a migration. These made this reason inconceivable to consider because the overall speed of the Edmontosausus' herd was so slower than what reading demises.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 468, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... in US and always in the herd, but they dont migrate. Third, the passages claim t...
^^^^
Line 6, column 103, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
...ability to migrate long distance, so it isnt inconceivable to think they were able t...
^^^^
Line 6, column 308, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: hadn't
...juveniles of Edmontosausus all of which hadnt enough growth and physical ability to p...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, second, secondly, so, third, in fact, in the first place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 22.412803532 112% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 30.3222958057 165% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1460.0 1373.03311258 106% => OK
No of words: 300.0 270.72406181 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86666666667 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76464986732 2.5805825403 107% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 145.348785872 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.526666666667 0.540411800872 97% => OK
syllable_count: 450.0 419.366225166 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.4084350488 49.2860985944 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.307692308 110.228320801 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0769230769 21.698381199 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.53846153846 7.06452816374 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.27373068433 187% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.30348036447 0.272083759551 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108967655434 0.0996497079465 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.190865273455 0.0662205650399 288% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174466004098 0.162205337803 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.131567956256 0.0443174109184 297% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.3589403974 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 53.8541721854 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 12.2367328918 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.42419426049 94% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 63.6247240618 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.