The author discusses three possible solution to solve the problem of declining population of Torreya taxifolia. However, the professor in the lecture casts doubts on and attacks each of the claim made in the reading.
To begin with, the author mentions that planting Torreya seeds in areas with microclimate of great humidity and coolness can possibly make Torreya thrive and become abundant again. It is also said in the passage that the microclimate in northern Florida is extremely beneficial to the growth of Torreya. The specific argument is challenged by the lecturer. She rebuts by bringing up the point that the northern areas' microclimate are largely affected by the main climate of those regions, where are getting drier due to global warming and will affect the microclimate. Therefore, the lecturer's argument disapprove its counter part in the reading.
Secondly, the writer claims that the preservation can be done through relocating Torreya to a entire new environment. Again, the professor believes thatthere are flaws in the writer's argument. She elaborates this by pointing out that ecologists once moved one plant to another location on the purpose of preventing it from going extinct, and that plant turned out to spread so quickly that it killed some of the already endangered plants of that location.
Last but not least, the author says that Torreya can be kept in a research center to be protected from extinction. The lecturer is doubtful that this is accurate. She convincingly points out that plants in the lab being studied and protected should be in large population and be genetically diverse. Moreover, she suggests that the case of Torreya does not meet those criteria.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 122, Rule ID: MAY_COULD_POSSIBLY[1]
Message: Use simply 'can'.
Suggestion: can
...oclimate of great humidity and coolness can possibly make Torreya thrive and become abundant...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 412, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'areas'' or 'area's'?
Suggestion: areas'; area's
...bringing up the point that the northern areas microclimate are largely affected by th...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 585, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'lecturers'' or 'lecturer's'?
Suggestion: lecturers'; lecturer's
...affect the microclimate. Therefore, the lecturers argument disapprove its counter part in...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 93, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...n be done through relocating Torreya to a entire new environment. Again, the prof...
^
Line 5, column 176, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'writers'' or 'writer's'?
Suggestion: writers'; writer's
...sor believes thatthere are flaws in the writers argument. She elaborates this by pointi...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 401, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...out to spread so quickly that it killed some of the already endangered plants of that locat...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 22.412803532 107% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 30.3222958057 142% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.01324503311 219% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1434.0 1373.03311258 104% => OK
No of words: 276.0 270.72406181 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19565217391 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75023628475 2.5805825403 107% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 145.348785872 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.583333333333 0.540411800872 108% => OK
syllable_count: 438.3 419.366225166 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.8295705181 49.2860985944 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.428571429 110.228320801 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7142857143 21.698381199 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.71428571429 7.06452816374 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 4.19205298013 143% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177715137264 0.272083759551 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0624918260115 0.0996497079465 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0382671968835 0.0662205650399 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110468011202 0.162205337803 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.044149813004 0.0443174109184 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.3589403974 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.8541721854 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 12.2367328918 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.04 8.42419426049 107% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 63.6247240618 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.