Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they challenge the specific points made in the reading passage.
There is a debate about whether dinosaurs are endotherms animals, that can keep their body temperatures constant. The reading passage provides three evidence that dinosaurs were endotherms animals, while the lecturer disagrees with the opinions and offers potent arguments.
First, the reading passage suggests dinosaur fossils that have been discovered in Polar Regions can be the indicator, as only endotherms could survive in such a glacial environment. However, the lecturer explains that Polar regions before were much warmer than it is now. Moreover, when it became cold, dinosaurs could have migrated to other warmer places. So the dinosaur fossils cannot prove dinosaurs are endotherms.
Second, like all modern endotherms, dinosaurs' legs were underneath the body to give energy for running, the reading passage suggests. Nonetheless, the lecturer gives another explanation about the leg position. She says the leg position was for undertaking more weights to allow dinosaurs to have larger bodies. Therefore, the leg position of dinosaurs does not mean high energy for running.
Finally, the writer believes that the presence of Haversian canals in dinosaurs' bones show they were endotherms animals. Notwithstanding, the lecturer contradicts the idea by pointing out the fossils show the presence of growth rings. The rings occur due to the thickening of the bone. The thickening indicates that the dinosaurs were not continuously but were experiencing periods of rapid growth and periods of no growth in succession. This pattern, she says, is a characteristic of non-endotherms animals.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-31 | madinaaaaaaaaaa | 80 | view |
| 2023-08-30 | madinaaaaaaaaaa | 73 | view |
| 2023-03-13 | saharmnd | 80 | view |
| 2023-03-04 | saharmnd | 80 | view |
| 2022-10-12 | jjj33333 | 52 | view |
- Some people believe that women should play an equal role as men in a country s police force or military force while others think women are not suitable for these kinds of jobs Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- New technologies change the way children spend their free time Do the advantages of these changes outweigh the disadvantages 78
- Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they challenge the specific points made in the reading passage 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
- Some people think that a huge amount of time and money is spent on the protection of wild animals and that money would do better on the human population To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, moreover, nonetheless, second, so, therefore, while, as for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 22.412803532 58% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 30.3222958057 79% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1366.0 1373.03311258 99% => OK
No of words: 242.0 270.72406181 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.64462809917 5.08290768461 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94415379849 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9024623957 2.5805825403 112% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 145.348785872 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590909090909 0.540411800872 109% => OK
syllable_count: 416.7 419.366225166 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.8247501312 49.2860985944 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.0666666667 110.228320801 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.1333333333 21.698381199 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.93333333333 7.06452816374 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0978539935413 0.272083759551 36% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0335684515703 0.0996497079465 34% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0403755148173 0.0662205650399 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0586011418036 0.162205337803 36% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0118740093736 0.0443174109184 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.3589403974 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 53.8541721854 87% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.14 12.2367328918 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.19 8.42419426049 109% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 63.6247240618 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.