Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading passage.
The reading and lecture are both both about the colonization of asteroid. The author of the reading states that it is advantageous while the lecturer disagrees. He metions there are not any scientific proof to prove it is beneficial and attacks each of the claim made in the article.
First, the author of the reading states that colonization grant imperative insights for various educational fields. In addition, it also acts as a step for future research. The lecturer believes there are flaws in the writer’s position, He contends that we even do not know about the number of asteroid and what resources they use so, it does not make any sense to believe asteroid provide valuable information for future endeavor.
Secondly, according to the writer colonization of asteroid is significant for the development of industries which eventually creates job opportunities for many. As a result, government and private company benefits from the burgeoning revenue of it. The speaker on other hand points out that although asteroid contain some precious resorces, nobody knows how much in quantity and worth it takes to bring back to earth. Thus, it is not cost effective and efficient for the economic growth.
Finally, the reading passage notes that colonizing is suitable for long term human survival as it prevent from deletorious effect of war and disaster. The professor rebuts this argument. He puts forth the idea that the asteroid is small and has not enough mass ans gravity therefore not applicable for human settlement in long run.
As we can see, the author and the lecturer holds very different views on the pros of colonization. The speaker effectively challanges the writer’s argument.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 29, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: both
The reading and lecture are both both about the colonization of asteroid. The...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 433, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... to bring back to earth. Thus, it is not cost effective and efficient for the eco...
^^
Line 4, column 51, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he reading passage notes that colonizing is suitable for long term human survival...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, while, in addition, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 30.3222958057 89% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.01324503311 239% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1430.0 1373.03311258 104% => OK
No of words: 277.0 270.72406181 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16245487365 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80830229773 2.5805825403 109% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 145.348785872 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.592057761733 0.540411800872 110% => OK
syllable_count: 447.3 419.366225166 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 55.7691272619 49.2860985944 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.3333333333 110.228320801 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4666666667 21.698381199 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.73333333333 7.06452816374 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.112289962425 0.272083759551 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0330077593313 0.0996497079465 33% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.034848748073 0.0662205650399 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0593773678255 0.162205337803 37% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0409256176208 0.0443174109184 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.3589403974 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.8541721854 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.2367328918 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.42419426049 102% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 63.6247240618 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.