Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading passage
The reading and lecture are both about the various forms of classical architecture such as Chinese, Japanese and so on has commonality in term of style and are highly susceptible to revive the ancient style of Greece and Rome. The lecturer further elaborates this by mentioning that they are reference to architecture and derive the principle inherent to Greece and Rome.
Similarly, according to the article, classical architectiure obtained details on how they were built and what elements did they use in their buildings as well as the changes evolved over time. The professor corroborates this by mentioning that despite the collapse of Roman Empire, they did not acquire the same style rather the Eastern Empire blended the Roman techniques with the Greece and that can be clearly seen in the Bazytine Empire which uses Roman styles.
Besides, the reading passage also notes that it was not until the Italian Renaissance that became prominent for reviving that style. In addition, in order to return the glory to ancient Romans and greeks ruined the buildings to study the process and built the new one combining the techniques. The speaker, on other hand, asserts that ancient architecture has dominance over the modern one. Furthermore, classical architecture were impacted by alluring decorative and constructive elements of that time. Therefore, they built any mode of architecture yet in different styles.
As we can see, the author and lecturer holds similar view points on reviving of ancient architecture on classical one, the speaker effectively supports the writer’s notion.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, furthermore, if, similarly, so, therefore, well, in addition, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 7.30242825607 178% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 22.412803532 80% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 30.3222958057 112% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1344.0 1373.03311258 98% => OK
No of words: 253.0 270.72406181 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.31225296443 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7968609584 2.5805825403 108% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 145.348785872 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.561264822134 0.540411800872 104% => OK
syllable_count: 434.7 419.366225166 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 21.2450331126 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.8246487235 49.2860985944 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.4 110.228320801 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3 21.698381199 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.6 7.06452816374 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 4.45695364238 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.112170699403 0.272083759551 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0415579527417 0.0996497079465 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0305880485717 0.0662205650399 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0681153818437 0.162205337803 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0158250709712 0.0443174109184 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.3589403974 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 53.8541721854 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.0289183223 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.2367328918 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.43 8.42419426049 112% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 63.6247240618 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.7273730684 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.498013245 114% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.2008830022 134% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.