Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading passage.
Both the reading and the listening are talking about a gold mask which archaeologist Heinrich Schliemann found in a 3500-year-old Greeek tomb. But they contradict each other. The reading believes the mask is a fake while the listening casts doubt on the idea of the reading.
First, about the Schliemann's dishonerst behavior on other occasions. The lecturer claims that the Greek government noticed the Schliemann's behavior before, so they watched this exploration closely to surpervision the whole time. And Schliemann didn't have enough space or time to cheat. The government wanted to make sure the mask is not a fake too. This conflicts the first reading idea.
Second, the professor points out that the mask is another art style at that acient age. This style is similar with the old period king mask. For example, the mask have perfect detail about the lips and the beard. This challenges the reading point that the mask beard doesn't resemble the facial hair represented on any of the other gold masks.
Finally, the listening asserts that Schliemann stop from exploring the site was reasonable at that age. In the past, most of the archaeologists were treasure hunters who cannot understand the culture of the treasure. They always found the valueable treasure everywhere, however they stopped exploring quickly when they realized worthless of the site. This opposes the reading third idea that the Schliemann abrupt closing of the site because of he knew the mask was a fake.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 245, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...ervision the whole time. And Schliemann didnt have enough space or time to cheat. The...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 268, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...s the reading point that the mask beard doesnt resemble the facial hair represented on...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 435, Rule ID: BECAUSE_OF_I[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'because he' instead.
Suggestion: because he
...e Schliemann abrupt closing of the site because of he knew the mask was a fake.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, second, so, third, while, for example, talking about, on the whole
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 22.412803532 80% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 30.3222958057 82% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1245.0 1373.03311258 91% => OK
No of words: 244.0 270.72406181 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10245901639 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95227774224 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61376465168 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 145.348785872 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577868852459 0.540411800872 107% => OK
syllable_count: 358.2 419.366225166 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 21.2450331126 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.8978891233 49.2860985944 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 77.8125 110.228320801 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.25 21.698381199 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06452816374 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.113922452948 0.272083759551 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0387580381029 0.0996497079465 39% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0381638895821 0.0662205650399 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0705670035888 0.162205337803 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0218864006681 0.0443174109184 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 13.3589403974 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 53.8541721854 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 11.0289183223 73% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.71 12.2367328918 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.75 8.42419426049 92% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 63.6247240618 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.498013245 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.