Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading passage.
The reading is talking about the benefits of making doctors write and store their records electronically instead of on paper. The reading gives us three reasons to prove the benefits. However, the lecturer doesn't confirm it and doubt all the three benefits for the reasons come below.
First, As the reading says, by recording electronically, we will save a lot of money. That's because we won't use that much paper anymore. Also, it will have other benefits like reducing the required storage space, retrieving the data easier, et cetera. However, the lecturer doesn't confirm it; because he says that, even by recording electronically, doctors will use papers for recording and keep them as backups. So we haven't given up on the traditional method.
Second, as the reading says, when we record electronically, we will avoid writing errors and the text will be much easier for reading. Again the lecturer doesn't confirm; because, as he says, doctors won't work with computers directly and they will use papers for their transcripts, et cetera, and their officers will do the electronic work; therefore, again, errors are as possible as they were before.
Third, one of the benefits that the reading is talking about, is the effect of electronic recording on ease of researches. This statement is without considering the fact that, for attaining doctors' data for researches, many permissions from many people are required, including patients. Clearly it doesn't seem practical and that much helpful that we get all those permissions from all those people. Even if we pass all these steps, has electronic recording been helpful for researches a lot?
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 207, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...ove the benefits. However, the lecturer doesnt confirm it and doubt all the three bene...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 87, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: That's
...ronically, we will save a lot of money. Thats because we wont use that much paper any...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 275, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...asier, et cetera. However, the lecturer doesnt confirm it; because he says that, even ...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 420, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: haven't
...cording and keep them as backups. So we havent given up on the traditional method. S...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 155, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
... easier for reading. Again the lecturer doesnt confirm; because, as he says, doctors w...
^^^^^^
Line 11, column 299, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...equired, including patients. Clearly it doesnt seem practical and that much helpful th...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, second, so, therefore, third, talking about
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 30.0 22.412803532 134% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 23.0 30.3222958057 76% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1388.0 1373.03311258 101% => OK
No of words: 268.0 270.72406181 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17910447761 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71049409438 2.5805825403 105% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 145.348785872 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55223880597 0.540411800872 102% => OK
syllable_count: 419.4 419.366225166 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 4.0 8.23620309051 49% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 1.25165562914 479% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.3588323372 49.2860985944 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.1428571429 110.228320801 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1428571429 21.698381199 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.92857142857 7.06452816374 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 4.19205298013 143% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0458141985831 0.272083759551 17% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0191515951395 0.0996497079465 19% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0196039243255 0.0662205650399 30% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0335379598191 0.162205337803 21% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0213991105296 0.0443174109184 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.3589403974 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.8541721854 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.2367328918 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.42419426049 98% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 63.6247240618 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.