Thousands of animals currently reside in zoos around the world. Recently, there has been much debate about the value of zoos in today's world. Careful consideration of the facts reveals that zoos are unethical and should be closed.
First, defenders of zoos say that they are an important way of saving animals from extinction. However, in actuality, zoos have had very little success in protecting animals. One reason for this is because many animals do not thrive in zoos. Breeding in captivity is often .difficult to encourage. Endangered animals fare far better with protection programs that allow them to stay in the wild.
Additionally, zoos do not adequately provide animals with living spaces that are like their natural habitats. As a result, animals are not able to behave as they normally would. For example, a lion in a small cage is not able to run around, much less hunt. In the end, the animals end up depressed or with behavioral problems. This would not occur, of course, if they were not kept in zoos in the first place.
Finally, zoos simply are not the best way to study animals. There are a number of well-researched books available. Alternately, wildlife biologists stand to gain much more knowledge about animals by observing them in the wild. That way, they see how animals interact with other creatures without human interference.
The lecturer posits that zoos are beneficial for animals and scieentists too. Then, he opposes the writer's opinion which condemn zoos in several ways.
First, the professor avers that zoos are incrediable tools to protect endangered animals. He elaborates on this topic by explaining that in 1997 in a zoo in California, the zoo saved Cando species through a very successful captive breeding program. They reproduce cando and other animal and release them into wild habitat. The zoo did not have problems to deal with this program. In another attempt, they increased the population of a bird to 330 ones by this captive program. He insists that with out this captive breeding program, cando would extinct. This explanation clearly repudiates the idea of the author which zoos have a low rate of success in helping endangered animals.
Second, the speaker points out that modern zoos run based on teh natural habitat philosophy, based on that, animal live in an environment cimilar to their natural home. He mentions a zoo in Norht Carolina in which animals live in a very spacious habitat comfortably. The animal care givers in zoo aid animals to live in a safer invirionment. Consequently, the professor rebuts the writer's idea that animals in zoos suffer from a natrual life through which they end up having a depressed life.
Third, the lecturer states that zoos provide reserchers and people with the best way to observe and study live animals in an accessible way. No books can compenste a live animal observation, the professor says. For example, no body have a chance to keep a silver-back gorila in their house, instead in zoos researchers have the goldren opportunity to watch them. He belives that live animals observings is a very intersting and unique way of animal study which you cannot find in any book. With this justification, he repudiates the author's idea that there are myriad book about zoology which we don't need to keep animals in zoos.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 100, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'writers'' or 'writer's'?
Suggestion: writers'; writer's
...d scieentists too. Then, he opposes the writers opinion which condemn zoos in several w...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n which condemn zoos in several ways. First, the professor avers that zoos are...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 456, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...creased the population of a bird to 330 ones by this captive program. He insists tha...
^^^^
Line 2, column 502, Rule ID: WITH_OUT[1]
Message: This word is usually written together. Did you mean 'without'?
Suggestion: without
...y this captive program. He insists that with out this captive breeding program, cando wo...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...uccess in helping endangered animals. Second, the speaker points out that mode...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 388, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'writers'' or 'writer's'?
Suggestion: writers'; writer's
... Consequently, the professor rebuts the writers idea that animals in zoos suffer from a...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... they end up having a depressed life. Third, the lecturer states that zoos pro...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 127, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an accessible way" with adverb for "accessible"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...t way to observe and study live animals in an accessible way. No books can compenste a live animal o...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 232, Rule ID: ANY_BODY[2]
Message: Did you mean 'nobody'?
Suggestion: nobody
...ation, the professor says. For example, no body have a chance to keep a silver-back gor...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 541, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...h this justification, he repudiates the authors idea that there are myriad book about z...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 576, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'books'?
Suggestion: books
... the authors idea that there are myriad book about zoology which we dont need to kee...
^^^^
Line 4, column 604, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... are myriad book about zoology which we dont need to keep animals in zoos.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, if, second, so, then, third, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 10.4613686534 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 12.0772626932 132% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 22.412803532 138% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 30.3222958057 158% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1634.0 1373.03311258 119% => OK
No of words: 329.0 270.72406181 122% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96656534954 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25891501996 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65785615355 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 145.348785872 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.534954407295 0.540411800872 99% => OK
syllable_count: 517.5 419.366225166 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 3.25607064018 276% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 13.0662251656 138% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.7130625893 49.2860985944 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.7777777778 110.228320801 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2777777778 21.698381199 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.66666666667 7.06452816374 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 12.0 4.19205298013 286% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 4.33554083885 254% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.233872873333 0.272083759551 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0905087434243 0.0996497079465 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0591884726231 0.0662205650399 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163245676963 0.162205337803 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0348817380749 0.0443174109184 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.3589403974 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.8541721854 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.2367328918 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.42419426049 100% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 63.6247240618 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.7273730684 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.