tpo 31
The professor makes a strong and convincing argument to cast doubt on the writer's claim which states the line which found in the sinosauropteryx's fossil in volcanic ash, are not sign of feather or they were not functional feather. The three reasons that the professor argues with come in following.
First, the article claims that the critics showed that these line formed after sinosaur's dead and they don't represent functional structures. In contrast, the professor refutes this idea by explaining that after decomposition of dinosaur their body preserved well in volcanic ash like other animal'a fossil in that place. he states that these well preserved fossil related to well functional feathers no frils.
Secondly, the article points out that if these were feather, scientist cann't tell with certainty which part of dinosaur body were. However, the professor argues this idea by explaining that the chemical structure of feather and frills are different and beta caroten in feather is a very good sign for them where the frills do not have beta caroten protein. he asserts certainly that these line are related to feathers.
Third and last, the article stated taht feathers have known function as thermoregulation or flying for birds and the place that they found in these fossils don't match with this application. Conversly, the porfessor adds some more applicatioin such as display in mating for some feathers and said an example of this usage by calling Picac bird which has some orange and white feather. he inferes that these line can be related to some displaing feathers which sinosauropteryx used for mating.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 104, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ne formed after sinosaurs dead and they dont represent functional structures. In con...
^^^^
Line 3, column 321, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: He
...ike other animala fossil in that place. he states that these well preserved fossil...
^^
Line 3, column 391, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'feathers'' or 'feather's'?
Suggestion: feathers'; feather's
...erved fossil related to well functional feathers no frils. Secondly, the article point...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 53, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'feathered'.
Suggestion: feathered
...e article points out that if these were feather, scientist cannt tell with certainty wh...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 358, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: He
...rills do not have beta caroten protein. he asserts certainly that these line are r...
^^
Line 7, column 157, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... place that they found in these fossils dont match with this application. Conversly,...
^^^^
Line 7, column 385, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: He
...hich has some orange and white feather. he inferes that these line can be related ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, second, secondly, so, third, well, in contrast, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.48453608247 107% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 4.92783505155 20% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 5.05154639175 198% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 3.03092783505 561% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 29.0 32.9175257732 88% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 26.3917525773 110% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.85567010309 130% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1364.0 937.175257732 146% => OK
No of words: 264.0 206.0 128% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16666666667 4.54256449028 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 3.78020617076 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6417107695 2.54303337028 104% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 127.690721649 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.549242424242 0.622605031667 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 409.5 290.88556701 141% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.41237113402 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.13402061856 33% => OK
Article: 8.0 0.824742268041 970% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.83505154639 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 1.44329896907 69% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6804123711 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 16.3608247423 147% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 58.0138199551 44.8134815571 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.0 76.5299724578 162% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 16.8248392259 143% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.81818181818 4.34317383033 157% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 2.54639175258 275% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 7.41237113402 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.49484536082 134% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.94845360825 76% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.216113520407 0% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0766984524023 0% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0603063233224 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.12726935374 0% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0580467560999 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 8.37731958763 178% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 70.7449484536 67% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 3.82989690722 81% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 7.45979381443 170% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 8.71597938144 149% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 7.59969072165 110% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 41.2886597938 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 8.62886597938 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 8.54432989691 136% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 8.15463917526 159% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.