Thousands of animals currently reside in zoos around the world. Recently, there has been much debate about the value of zoos in today's world. Careful consideration of the facts reveals that zoos are unethical and should be closed.
First, defenders of zoos say that they are an important way of saving animals from extinction. However, in actuality, zoos have had very little success in protecting animals. One reason for this is because many animals do not thrive in zoos. Breeding in captivity is often .difficult to encourage. Endangered animals fare far better with protection programs that allow them to stay in the wild.
Additionally, zoos do not adequately provide animals with living spaces that are like their natural habitats. As a result, animals are not able to behave as they normally would. For example, a lion in a small cage is not able to run around, much less hunt. In the end, the animals end up depressed or with behavioral problems. This would not occur, of course, if they were not kept in zoos in the first place.
Finally, zoos simply are not the best way to study animals. There are a number of well-researched books available. Alternately, wildlife biologists stand to gain much more knowledge about animals by observing them in the wild. That way, they see how animals interact with other creatures without human interference.
The lecture and the reading are both about the role of the zoo for animals. According to the lecture, it is not a good place for animals. In this regard, the reading brings three problems that are relevant to keep animals in the zoo. On the other hand, the lecturer refutes those problems and argues some arguments against the reading.
First, it is stated in the reading that, the zoo cannot protect the animals as well. It is very hard for them to breed and thrive. On the contrary, the lecturer questions this point and states that the zoo protects the animals from the danger of other species. He exemplifies a type of bird which were in danger of extinction and by protecting in the
zoo and help it to breed, it has survived form extinction.
Next, the author puts forward the idea that animals need to live in their natural habitats while the zoo does not look like their habitats so it can end up with behavioral problems for them. However, the lecturer insists that the zoo has a natural behavior philosophy. It brings a great safe for them that they enjoy that condition. He also exemplifies keeping a species in the zoo from this habitat in the North Corina, owing to the danger of Zokipper. Actually, the Zokiper had made the habitat unsafe for that species so the zoo removes this danger.
Finally, the reading goes on to mention that for study animals, the zoo is not a helpful way. Wildlife biologists have written so much information in the research books which are more gathers from their observations in the wilds. In contrast, the lecturer claims that the zoo is the best way to do research and find information about animals. They can by carefully observed in the zoo so it is more useful and effective that the wildlife book.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The lecture and the reading are both abo...
^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...es some arguments against the reading. First, it is stated in the reading that,...
^^^
Line 2, column 353, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r of extinction and by protecting in the zoo and help it to breed, it has survive...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...reed, it has survived form extinction. Next, the author puts forward the idea t...
^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...pecies so the zoo removes this danger. Finally, the reading goes on to mention ...
^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... and effective that the wildlife book.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, finally, first, however, if, look, so, well, while, in contrast, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 22.412803532 152% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 30.3222958057 129% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1441.0 1373.03311258 105% => OK
No of words: 312.0 270.72406181 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.61858974359 5.08290768461 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40303191338 2.5805825403 93% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 145.348785872 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.490384615385 0.540411800872 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 441.0 419.366225166 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 3.25607064018 246% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.7832636842 49.2860985944 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.7647058824 110.228320801 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3529411765 21.698381199 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.76470588235 7.06452816374 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 4.19205298013 143% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 4.45695364238 224% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.234120221219 0.272083759551 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0886929133774 0.0996497079465 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0607551630621 0.0662205650399 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14352257423 0.162205337803 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00956539332775 0.0443174109184 22% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 13.3589403974 71% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 53.8541721854 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 11.0289183223 72% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.52 12.2367328918 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.41 8.42419426049 88% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 63.6247240618 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.7273730684 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.