Both the writing and lecturer are discussing about how the buildings are used in Chaco canyon. while the author in the writing provides three theories to support that canyon are used for either residential, to store food or as ceremonial center. the lecturer argues otherwise.
first of all, the theory claim that chaco buildings are residential with hundreds of people on each housing since those buildings are similar to the apartment buildings. this theory is challenged by the lecturer. he states that although the exterior is similar to the apartment the interior is quite different than the modern building. additionally, he says that if the building were used for residential purpose there should be enough fireplace for each family, but there are only a few fireplaces in the largest building.
secondly, the theory states that the buildings were used as storage for food supply. since maize one of the main crop of chaos has to be stored for long periods in a larger area that means building. this argument is rebutted in the lecture. the lecturer states that during the excavation traces of maize or maize containers are not found in the building area. thus this theory lacks the evidence.
finally, the last theory states that the buildings were used as ceremonial center since broken pots were found during the excavation. the lecturer cast doubt on this by arguing that apart from the broken pots large quantity of building materials like sand and stones were found. additionally, he says that the broken pots might be the leftover from the meal of the construction workers.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 96, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: While
...the buildings are used in Chaco canyon. while the author in the writing provides thre...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 247, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
... to store food or as ceremonial center. the lecturer argues otherwise. first of al...
^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: First
...center. the lecturer argues otherwise. first of all, the theory claim that chaco bui...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 170, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...are similar to the apartment buildings. this theory is challenged by the lecturer. h...
^^^^
Line 2, column 213, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: He
...s theory is challenged by the lecturer. he states that although the exterior is si...
^^
Line 2, column 310, Rule ID: RATHER_THEN[2]
Message: Did you mean 'different 'from''? 'Different than' is often considered colloquial style.
Suggestion: from
...artment the interior is quite different than the modern building. additionally, he s...
^^^^
Line 2, column 336, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Additionally
...ite different than the modern building. additionally, he says that if the building were used...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Secondly
...ew fireplaces in the largest building. secondly, the theory states that the buildings w...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 85, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Since
...s were used as storage for food supply. since maize one of the main crop of chaos has...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 199, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...s in a larger area that means building. this argument is rebutted in the lecture. th...
^^^^
Line 3, column 241, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...is argument is rebutted in the lecture. the lecturer states that during the excavat...
^^^
Line 3, column 360, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Thus
...ers are not found in the building area. thus this theory lacks the evidence. finall...
^^^^
Line 3, column 360, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: thus,
...ers are not found in the building area. thus this theory lacks the evidence. finall...
^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Finally
.... thus this theory lacks the evidence. finally, the last theory states that the buildi...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 134, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
... pots were found during the excavation. the lecturer cast doubt on this by arguing ...
^^^
Line 4, column 279, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Additionally
...erials like sand and stones were found. additionally, he says that the broken pots might be ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, if, second, secondly, thus, while, apart from, as to, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 10.4613686534 182% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 22.412803532 80% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 30.3222958057 106% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1327.0 1373.03311258 97% => OK
No of words: 264.0 270.72406181 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02651515152 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54578990846 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 145.348785872 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.511363636364 0.540411800872 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 406.8 419.366225166 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 48.0883446262 49.2860985944 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.4666666667 110.228320801 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6 21.698381199 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.8 7.06452816374 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 16.0 4.19205298013 382% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0360414529536 0.272083759551 13% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0128846122986 0.0996497079465 13% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0335958827644 0.0662205650399 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0241742893296 0.162205337803 15% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0249761763118 0.0443174109184 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.3589403974 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 53.8541721854 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.0289183223 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 12.2367328918 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.89 8.42419426049 94% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 63.6247240618 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.