The reading and the lecture are both about Chevalier’s memoir. The article mentions that memoir has some faults and exaggerations, the lecturer disputes the claims presented in the article. His position is that Chevalier's memoir is almost correct.
According to the reading, the memoir mentions that he was very wealthy. The article mentions that he borrowed some money from a Swiss merchant, but it does not make sense. The argument is challenged by the lecturer. He claimed that borrowing money did not mean he was not rich, or even poor. Additionally, he points out that he used all of money to do the grambling, so he borrowed some money when he was waiting for his money.
Secondly, the author suggests dialog with the Volatire is not accurately correct. The article notes that it is hard to remember all the conversation, because it was written a few years later. The lecturer, however, asserts that it is not a problem. He goes on to say that Chevalier wrote the conversation every night, so it is almost correct.
Finally, the author puts forth the idea that it is hard to escape from a famous prison. The author contends that it is just a part that makes the reader have fun. In contrast the lecturer’s stance is that it is not a fake, it is real. He says that there is some evidence, an old Venetian document.
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 10, column 167, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: contrast,
...part that makes the reader have fun. In contrast the lecturer’s stance is that it is not...
^^^^^^^^
Line 10, column 299, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ome evidence, an old Venetian document.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, however, second, secondly, so, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 10.4613686534 172% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 22.412803532 156% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 15.0 30.3222958057 49% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1112.0 1373.03311258 81% => OK
No of words: 233.0 270.72406181 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.77253218884 5.08290768461 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90696013833 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65267995354 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 145.348785872 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.545064377682 0.540411800872 101% => OK
syllable_count: 336.6 419.366225166 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 12.0 8.23620309051 146% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 21.2450331126 66% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.7082191538 49.2860985944 50% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 69.5 110.228320801 63% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.5625 21.698381199 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5 7.06452816374 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0346670581949 0.272083759551 13% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0156524506306 0.0996497079465 16% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0329924862868 0.0662205650399 50% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0282929406627 0.162205337803 17% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0319133604624 0.0443174109184 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.3 13.3589403974 62% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.19 53.8541721854 138% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 11.0289183223 58% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 9.79 12.2367328918 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.85 8.42419426049 93% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 63.6247240618 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.7273730684 51% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.498013245 72% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 10, column 167, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: contrast,
...part that makes the reader have fun. In contrast the lecturer’s stance is that it is not...
^^^^^^^^
Line 10, column 299, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ome evidence, an old Venetian document.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, however, second, secondly, so, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 10.4613686534 172% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 22.412803532 156% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 15.0 30.3222958057 49% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1112.0 1373.03311258 81% => OK
No of words: 233.0 270.72406181 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.77253218884 5.08290768461 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90696013833 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65267995354 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 145.348785872 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.545064377682 0.540411800872 101% => OK
syllable_count: 336.6 419.366225166 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 12.0 8.23620309051 146% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 21.2450331126 66% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.7082191538 49.2860985944 50% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 69.5 110.228320801 63% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.5625 21.698381199 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5 7.06452816374 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0346670581949 0.272083759551 13% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0156524506306 0.0996497079465 16% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0329924862868 0.0662205650399 50% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0282929406627 0.162205337803 17% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0319133604624 0.0443174109184 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.3 13.3589403974 62% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.19 53.8541721854 138% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 11.0289183223 58% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 9.79 12.2367328918 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.85 8.42419426049 93% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 63.6247240618 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.7273730684 51% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.498013245 72% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.