This material addresses the question of the accuracy of the memoir written by Chevalier de Seingalt. The reading passage suggests that some aspects of the book are controversial. The lecturer, on the other hand, refutes this information by stating that the memoir is a reliable historical source.
To begin with, the reading passage highlights that the Chevalier wrongfully considered as a rich person irregardless of the fact that he borrowed money from a merchant. Meanwhile, the professor casts doubt on this and argues that the Chevalier might have needed cash untill his property was sold, and, therefore, he cannot be viewed as a poor person.
Additionally, the article posits that the records related to the conversations between the Chevalier and Volter could not have been reflected accurately since many years had passed from the time they had met. However, the professor advocates a different approach and provides the following details. Namely, she mentions that there is evidence that Chevalier was wrighting down the talks with Voltaire immediately after having them, and later he used that records to write the memoir.
Finally, the author invites attention to the fact that Chevalier could not have escaped from the prison in Venice in the way he described in the book; by making a hole in the ceiling. This goes counter to the information in the listening passage, according to which, official documents were found that contained an indication of the fact that the ceiling after the Chevalier's escape needed repair.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 75, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ion to the fact that Chevalier could not have escaped from the prison in Venice i...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, however, if, so, therefore, while, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 22.412803532 107% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1289.0 1373.03311258 94% => OK
No of words: 247.0 270.72406181 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21862348178 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96437052324 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72391720847 2.5805825403 106% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 145.348785872 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.603238866397 0.540411800872 112% => OK
syllable_count: 394.2 419.366225166 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 21.2450331126 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.5024741637 49.2860985944 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.9 110.228320801 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7 21.698381199 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.6 7.06452816374 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.132462811081 0.272083759551 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0529415989477 0.0996497079465 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0674280329636 0.0662205650399 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0785241398461 0.162205337803 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.029518826968 0.0443174109184 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.3589403974 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 53.8541721854 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.0289183223 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.2367328918 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.24 8.42419426049 110% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 63.6247240618 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.498013245 110% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.