This material addresses the question of the groupwork. The reading passage suggests that working in a team is beneficial both for the task to be done and for the team members. The lecturer, on the other hand, refutes this information by stating that relevant practical experience is problematic.
To begin with, the reading passage highlights that all the members of a group benefit from being involved in it since their work is seen and acknowledged. Meanwhile, the professor casts doubt on this and argues that the members of a team who do not work as hard are in the same position as the ones who contrbute seriously to the work. Therefore, the latter will be unhappy to work in a team since the recognition for the positive outcome is spread on each member of the team.
Additionally, the article posits that a group may perform tasks faster and with better quality since more knowledgeable and experienced workers are involved /in it/. However, the professor advocates a different approach and provides the following details. Namely, he mentions that it takes more time to accomplish a task by working in a group inasmuch as consensus among group members may be reached only after several discussions.
Finally, the author invites attention to the fact that employees benefit from being involved in a group since the responsibility for the actions of a group lies on a group as a whole. This goes counter to the information in the listening passage, according to which, a few members of a team may influence the decisions of a team whereas the negative outcomes of those decisions unfairly will apply to all the group members.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, however, if, may, so, therefore, whereas, while, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 22.412803532 76% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 30.3222958057 135% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1358.0 1373.03311258 99% => OK
No of words: 277.0 270.72406181 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90252707581 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80861785712 2.5805825403 109% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 145.348785872 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.516245487365 0.540411800872 96% => OK
syllable_count: 419.4 419.366225166 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 21.2450331126 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.2238238849 49.2860985944 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.454545455 110.228320801 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1818181818 21.698381199 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.63636363636 7.06452816374 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.142327568438 0.272083759551 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0552171652303 0.0996497079465 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0364770770023 0.0662205650399 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0915814251622 0.162205337803 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0358854592426 0.0443174109184 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.3589403974 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 53.8541721854 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 12.2367328918 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.42419426049 106% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 63.6247240618 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.498013245 114% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.