TOEFL T P O 1 - Integrated Writing Task

The article states that a new policy to allow employee to have four-day week will lead to a overall improvement in socio-economic condition as well as respective company and individual who will adopt that policy. The article provides three reason to support this policy. However, The Professor explains that new policy will not be beneficial to society at all. He refutes each of the author opinion.

First, the article claims that letting employee to take four-day week will increase company profits. The professor refutes this point by saying that this policy will instead cause company to spend more money on employees. The professor states that though individual empolyee is taking less money for four-day week, hiring more empolyee to support the work load will be expensive. Company not only required to pay salary to employee but also Health insurance and other service for employee is beared by company. So more employee means more Health Insurance cost as well as incresed cost to support accommodation for large employee group. In this way the professor denies the article logic that the new policy will make company benefitted.

Second, The article posits that new policy will create more job opportunity. However, the professor says that this policy will fail to create more job opportunity. The professor explains, if the company ask employee to make overtime instead of hiring new people then the policy will not be able to create more job. The professor also give support to his idea by saying that if the company have increase their expectation on employee that a worker will do the same amount of work in four days like the worker who work five-day week; In that case this policy will make work environment unpleasant.

Finally, The Professor opposes to the article point that this policy will improve individuals quality of life by saying that the policy will risk the employees job stability. In time of financial crisis the four-day week empoyee will be terminated first because of theri low involvement with company. The possiblity of poromotion will decrease. While empoyee are more likely to spend more time with family they will face a hard time to learn new things for their career advancement. As a result the proposition of the reading that employee quality of life will be increased by the policy will be greatly undermined.

Votes
Average: 0.3 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The article states that a new policy to ...
^^^
Line 1, column 94, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...oyee to have four-day week will lead to a overall improvement in socio-economic c...
^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... refutes each of the author opinion. First, the article claims that letting e...
^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...policy will make company benefitted. Second, The article posits that new poli...
^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ll make work environment unpleasant. Finally, The Professor opposes to the ar...
^^
Line 7, column 486, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ew things for their career advancement. As a result the proposition of the reading...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, if, second, so, then, well, while, as a result, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 5.04856512141 376% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 17.0 12.0772626932 141% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 22.412803532 120% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 30.3222958057 142% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.01324503311 219% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1972.0 1373.03311258 144% => OK
No of words: 390.0 270.72406181 144% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05641025641 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44391917772 4.04702891845 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53576650514 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 145.348785872 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.441025641026 0.540411800872 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 622.8 419.366225166 149% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 12.0 8.23620309051 146% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 13.0662251656 145% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.7404549187 49.2860985944 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.789473684 110.228320801 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5263157895 21.698381199 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.94736842105 7.06452816374 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 4.19205298013 143% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 4.33554083885 231% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.3589403974 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.8541721854 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.2367328918 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.5 8.42419426049 89% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 63.6247240618 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.

Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.