TOEFL T P O 21 - Integrated Writing Task, genetic modification
The main idea of both the passage and the talk is about genetic modification whether have benefits or not. In the text, the author believes that genetically modified plant promises numerous benefits. The lecturer challenges all the reasons mentioned in the reading. She is of the opinion that none of these claims is far-reaching.
Firstly, the author states that genetically modified trees are able to endure harsh climate, they designed to be hardier than other usual trees. Conversely, the lecturer brings up the idea that some of genetically modified tree may bear some specific conditions, but there are many different aspects that should be considered. Furthermore, she says that some of natural trees can survive in harsh condition, but all of the modified tree will be died because they have same characteristics.
Moreover, the reading passage asserts that modified trees provide some economical benefits since they can grow faster. The lecturer, on the other hand, argues that modified trees have much hidden cost that should be contemplated. For instance, the farmers pay to seed when they want to cultivate their farms. While natural plants seed are usable for next cultivation. By considering these matter, these trees have not economical benefits.
Eventually, the author of the reading holds the view that modified tree could prevent the overexploitation of wild trees since their high yields of growth. The lecture, however, rebuts this by asserting that modified trees have numerous adverse effects on wildlife. In addition, she says that modified trees grow aggressively, and they make numerous problems for other trees such as using natural resource and sunlight. Thus, modified trees negative impacts on environment is more than its benefits.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...one of these claims is far-reaching. Firstly, the author states that genetica...
^^^^
Line 3, column 282, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...some specific conditions, but there are many different aspects that should be considered. Furt...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 366, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ered. Furthermore, she says that some of natural trees can survive in harsh condi...
^^
Line 3, column 418, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...ees can survive in harsh condition, but all of the modified tree will be died because they...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ause they have same characteristics. Moreover, the reading passage asserts th...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 77, Rule ID: ECONOMICAL_ECONOMIC[1]
Message: Did you mean 'economic' (=connected with economy)?
Suggestion: economic
...sserts that modified trees provide some economical benefits since they can grow faster. Th...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 425, Rule ID: ECONOMICAL_ECONOMIC[1]
Message: Did you mean 'economic' (=connected with economy)?
Suggestion: economic
...ring these matter, these trees have not economical benefits. Eventually, the autho...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... trees have not economical benefits. Eventually, the author of the reading ho...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, so, thus, while, for instance, in addition, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 22.412803532 120% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 30.3222958057 89% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1495.0 1373.03311258 109% => OK
No of words: 277.0 270.72406181 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39711191336 5.08290768461 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7477122219 2.5805825403 106% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 145.348785872 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.548736462094 0.540411800872 102% => OK
syllable_count: 456.3 419.366225166 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.4877720029 49.2860985944 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.4375 110.228320801 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3125 21.698381199 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06452816374 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 4.19205298013 191% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0420170861737 0.272083759551 15% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0176693756104 0.0996497079465 18% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0346406132871 0.0662205650399 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0370292931959 0.162205337803 23% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0437319607253 0.0443174109184 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.3589403974 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 53.8541721854 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.74 12.2367328918 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 63.6247240618 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.