The reading passage claims that a four-day worker would be better than a worker who works 5 days a week.
To begin with, the reading passage claims a shortened workweek would increase company profits since the employees would have more efficient if they have the time to relax, and the company would pay the same amount of salary to hire additional workers; however, the speaker rebuts this argument that the company will probably spend much more money on training the employees, providing medical insurance, more supplies and space to work.
Moreover, the author maintains the four-day work policy would decrease the unemployment rate. The lecturer casts doubt on this that the company would raise their expectation to the employees which would make the job experience unpleasant, and the employees would have to work overtime to reach that expectation.
Lastly, the writer indicates that the employees who work four days a week would get an exchange for more free time to spend with their families and interests. Yet the professor suggests in contrary that the employees' economic status would lower their life quality and hinder their job career because they are only getting 80 percent of the original salary. In addition, the companies would prefer the five days workers instead of four-day workers when hiring a manager, so when cutting off employees, they would most likely to lose their job.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 336, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hat the company will probably spend much more money on training the employees, pr...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, lastly, moreover, so, in addition, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 10.4613686534 19% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 5.04856512141 257% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 22.412803532 71% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 30.3222958057 66% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1177.0 1373.03311258 86% => OK
No of words: 229.0 270.72406181 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13973799127 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89008302616 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41346881389 2.5805825403 94% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 145.348785872 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.580786026201 0.540411800872 107% => OK
syllable_count: 346.5 419.366225166 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 13.0662251656 54% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 21.2450331126 151% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 105.987677374 49.2860985944 215% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 168.142857143 110.228320801 153% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.7142857143 21.698381199 151% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.42857142857 7.06452816374 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.614419974261 0.272083759551 226% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.299538872685 0.0996497079465 301% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0723914209757 0.0662205650399 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.37279505051 0.162205337803 230% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0821373019244 0.0443174109184 185% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.1 13.3589403974 143% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.46 53.8541721854 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.0289183223 132% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 12.2367328918 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.09 8.42419426049 108% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 63.6247240618 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.5 10.7273730684 163% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.498013245 141% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.2008830022 134% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.