The authors mentions that the compulsory policy which allows employees working in the United States to work 4 days per week instead of 5 days and believes that it would bring advantages to the employees, companies and country as a whole while the professor refutes that perspective and has the opposite viewpoint.
First of all, author says that with the reduced amount of salaries of employees who work 4 days per week to 80% of the normal employees, individual companies can raise their profit. However, professor believes that it adds the company's cost as more employees need more training and more office spaces and equipments such as computers. In addition, the cost associated with medical benefits or health benefits will also increase as there is not any different between the cost of the health benefits of four-day week employee and 5-day week employee.
Furthermore, author states that 4-day employee would make less costly error and are more alert while the professor has the opposite viewpoint, said that in 4-day employees policy, managers would expect more from their employees and this would raise their expectation which would lead employees work 5 days in practical instead of 4 day to meet the employer expectation. This means that employees in this new mandatory policy would work overtime which makes them unsatisfied.
Finally, author says that 4-day week work policy would result in an increase in employees' life quality while the professor refutes this opinion. He believes that this policy will increase the associated risks and stresses which results in reducing the quality of life. Employees would have less opportunity for promotion especially in economic recession. Management also would like to promote the management positions as they would need supervisors who can work 5 day per week. The employee would not feel security in their job. All this factor would cause employees in this new policy experience a lower quality of life.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 13, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'mention'.
Suggestion: mention
The authors mentions that the compulsory policy which allows...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, so, while, in addition, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 10.4613686534 19% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 5.04856512141 357% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 12.0772626932 132% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 22.412803532 116% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 30.3222958057 109% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1654.0 1373.03311258 120% => OK
No of words: 318.0 270.72406181 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20125786164 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58533409356 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 145.348785872 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.474842767296 0.540411800872 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 486.9 419.366225166 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 8.23620309051 36% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 21.2450331126 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 90.780259724 49.2860985944 184% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.833333333 110.228320801 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5 21.698381199 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.75 7.06452816374 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.554818622988 0.272083759551 204% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.235491404873 0.0996497079465 236% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0903800777216 0.0662205650399 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.363233531563 0.162205337803 224% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0725309137313 0.0443174109184 164% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.3589403974 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 53.8541721854 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.0289183223 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.18 12.2367328918 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.42419426049 100% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 63.6247240618 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 10.7273730684 168% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.498013245 118% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.