The lecturer presents some disadvantages, that both employers and employees would face, if a policy that allows the latter ones to work four days a week instead five, would be enforced. He says that the arguments stated in the passage are far away from being accurate, when compared with reality.
First, the company will be confronted with visible profit loss. This is due to the fact that employees are not able to cover the work they used to do before. Furthermore, hiring new staff does not resolve the issue, since this implies providing professional training for the new personnel. In addition, the company must pay more medical assurances, allocate new office spaces and buy electronic devices. This directly contradicts what the article indicates when referring to profitability.
Second, such a schedule affects personal life, because the employers have the expectations that present employees have to fulfill the same amount of task as beforehand. If they cannot achieve this goal, it is expected to do overwork. Therefore, this conducts to overburdened and overloaded mental states, perturbing the family environment. This counter-argument shows that theories enunciated in the passage, are far away from being applicable.
Third, this category of workers are also professionally affected in long run. In other words, their chances of building a strong and successful career lessens considerably or worse, they are more likely to confront with job instability. It is common accepted that people advancing in their career are those who prove to be hard-working and whom availability of work is higher superior comparing to the others.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 96, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the employers have the expectations that present employees have to fulfill the sa...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, if, second, so, therefore, third, in addition, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 22.412803532 103% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 30.3222958057 92% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1395.0 1373.03311258 102% => OK
No of words: 259.0 270.72406181 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3861003861 5.08290768461 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95533049331 2.5805825403 115% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 145.348785872 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.656370656371 0.540411800872 121% => OK
syllable_count: 433.8 419.366225166 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 3.25607064018 338% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 8.23620309051 36% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.25165562914 399% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.2129846258 49.2860985944 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.6428571429 110.228320801 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5 21.698381199 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.21428571429 7.06452816374 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.294517752457 0.272083759551 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0765095036195 0.0996497079465 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0836207633294 0.0662205650399 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157043214859 0.162205337803 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0706219459446 0.0443174109184 159% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.3589403974 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 53.8541721854 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 12.2367328918 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.65 8.42419426049 115% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 63.6247240618 132% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.