TPO-02 - Integrated Writing Task In many organizations, perhaps the best way to approach certain new projects is to assemble a group of people into a team. Having a team of people attack a project offers several advantages. First of all, a group of people
The reading passage and lecture have conflicting opinions about whether or not working as a group is beneficial. The article strongly postulates that the best approach to achieve a new project is to create a team is consisting of several people. On the other hand, The listening adamantly delineates that a group of people who have been working together for 6 months, after that it is recognized that every team has some free-riders who haven't contributed as much as rest of own team's coworkers and the lecturer gives to this for several compelling reasons.
First and foremost, According to the author of the excerpt, the group of people has a highly educated, fairly good experience and qualification these are essentials to reach a decisiveness and make imaginable solutions to some certain problems more abruptly. Nonetheless, The professor offsets these points by declaring that some real contributors were asked how they felt about the new project then it is noted that their attitude totally opposite of the reading passage.
On top of this, the professor in the listening points out that most of the team making a lot of meeting to make an agreement which is how to increase the profit of the company and so on. In addition to this, the most prestigious people of the team said that this outline never works and it is even not discussed further. these claims refute the writer’s implications of how the responsibility for the decision is spreading to each group members not only individuals.
The text lastly insists that the individuals have an opportunity to shine on their partners and delivering own voice to this work is rewarding for them. Subsequently, they do not bother to carry out the job by exposing other coworkers. The speaker in the lecture counters these indications by asserting that one or two members having an impact on the group declaration, in a result, others who disagree with this statement will be ignored by rest of coworkers.
- Tpo36-integrated 3
- TPO16Q1 80
- TPO 7 integrated: receiving the eco-certification in wood companies of United States 80
- .Some people think that the government should use extra money to fund programs to improve the environment. Others think that it is better for the government to spend money to support arts programs. Which option do you prefer? Use specific reasons and ex 83
- Car manufacturers and governments have been eagerly seeking a replacement for the automobile's main source of power, the internal-combustion engine. By far the most promising alternative source of energy for cars is the hydrogen-based fuel-cell engin 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 65, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
...lecture have conflicting opinions about whether or not working as a group is beneficial. The a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 214, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...hieve a new project is to create a team is consisting of several people. On the other hand, T...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 438, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: haven't
...hat every team has some free-riders who havent contributed as much as rest of own team...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 322, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: These
...s and it is even not discussed further. these claims refute the writer's implica...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, lastly, nonetheless, so, then, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 22.412803532 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 30.3222958057 148% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1646.0 1373.03311258 120% => OK
No of words: 330.0 270.72406181 122% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98787878788 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26214759535 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87160827202 2.5805825403 111% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 145.348785872 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.548484848485 0.540411800872 101% => OK
syllable_count: 513.0 419.366225166 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 21.2450331126 141% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 65.1325412823 49.2860985944 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 149.636363636 110.228320801 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.0 21.698381199 138% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06452816374 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.374442391204 0.272083759551 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12549006195 0.0996497079465 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0521713352534 0.0662205650399 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.203267373358 0.162205337803 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0408091060499 0.0443174109184 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 13.3589403974 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.03 53.8541721854 76% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 5.55761589404 202% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.0289183223 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 12.2367328918 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.29 8.42419426049 110% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 63.6247240618 137% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.7273730684 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.498013245 133% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.