The reading passage illustrates a fascinating topic pertaining to performance of working in teams and the advantages for the same. However, the professor refutes each of the authors claims and provides examples for each.
First, the reading passage posits that by working in a team,the task can be completed more quickly than it was being done by an individual seperately. It also states that wider range of knowledge helps in completing the task easily. However, the lecturer disagrees with the reading passage and claims only some of the people in the team work to their potential and others don't do significant work. In the worst case, some people don't even work a little.The recognition goes to the team as a whole and the real contributors to the work. At the same time, the lecturer claims that the individual who does the major work is not rewarded for the work done by him and the credit goes to the whole team.
Second, the reading passage pushes forth the idea that people can take risky decisions while working in groups. Nevertheless, the professor rebutes this argument by saying that some people become domineering and make other people in the group to work according to the decision made by the head of the group.Some of the ideas given by the co-workers of the group are ignored although they were good. The fellow workers will be convinced to work on the idea given by the head of the group. when the project fails, the blame goes to the entire to the entire team and not the head of the group. So, the lecturer claims that working in a group doesn't benefit in the broad sense.
Third, the reading passage says that the work is completed in a quick way while working in a group. On the other hand, the professor disagrees with the claim and states that it takes long time to meet consensus. Different workers have different opinions and it is difficult for all of them to come to a common opinion.
In this way, the reading passage and the lecturer provides all the necessary information about whether working in a group is useful or useless and provides various reasons for their stance. The reading passage should include more information about the uses of working in a group and should address all the claims made by the professor to make the passage plausible.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 60, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , the
...passage posits that by working in a team,the task can be completed more quickly than...
^^^^
Line 2, column 306, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...ith the reading passage and claims only some of the people in the team work to their potent...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 372, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...team work to their potential and others dont do significant work. In the worst case,...
^^^^
Line 2, column 429, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...nt work. In the worst case, some people dont even work a little.The recognition goes...
^^^^
Line 2, column 453, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...se, some people dont even work a little.The recognition goes to the team as a whole...
^^^
Line 2, column 618, Rule ID: DOES_NP_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'be'?
Suggestion: be
... the individual who does the major work is not rewarded for the work done by him a...
^^
Line 3, column 307, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Some
... decision made by the head of the group.Some of the ideas given by the co-workers of...
^^^^
Line 3, column 307, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: Some
... decision made by the head of the group.Some of the ideas given by the co-workers of the gr...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 488, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: When
...he idea given by the head of the group. when the project fails, the blame goes to th...
^^^^
Line 3, column 639, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...lecturer claims that working in a group doesnt benefit in the broad sense. Third, the...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 60, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a quick way" with adverb for "quick"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...passage says that the work is completed in a quick way while working in a group. On the other ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'nevertheless', 'second', 'so', 'third', 'while', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.245939675174 0.261695866417 94% => OK
Verbs: 0.155452436195 0.158904122519 98% => OK
Adjectives: 0.07656612529 0.0723426182421 106% => OK
Adverbs: 0.030162412993 0.0435111971325 69% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0208816705336 0.0277247811725 75% => OK
Prepositions: 0.136890951276 0.128828473217 106% => OK
Participles: 0.0533642691415 0.0370669169778 144% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.46312301763 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0324825986079 0.0208969081088 155% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00154638098197 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.178654292343 0.128158765124 139% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0116009280742 0.0158828679856 73% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0046403712297 0.0114777025283 40% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2282.0 1645.83664459 139% => OK
No of words: 400.0 271.125827815 148% => OK
Chars per words: 5.705 6.08160592843 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.472135955 4.04852973271 110% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.3225 0.374372842146 86% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.24 0.287516216867 83% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.1375 0.187439937562 73% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.095 0.113142543107 84% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46312301763 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 145.348785872 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.44 0.539623497131 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 46.6569658797 53.8517498576 87% => OK
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0529801325 130% => OK
Sentence length: 23.5294117647 21.7502111507 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.6039647229 49.3711431718 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.235294118 132.220823453 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5294117647 21.7502111507 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.647058823529 0.878197800319 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 11.0 3.39072847682 324% => Correct essay format wanted or double check grammar & spelling issues after essay writing.
Readability: 47.5294117647 50.5018328374 94% => OK
Elegance: 2.11235955056 1.90840788429 111% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.602305944201 0.549887131256 110% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.1990242149 0.142949733639 139% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.129325704937 0.0787303798458 164% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.693007804658 0.631733273073 110% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.151703056622 0.139662658121 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.317522428281 0.266732575781 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.085593035922 0.103435571967 83% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.561377792286 0.414875509568 135% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.10200528479 0.0530846634433 192% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.45053685012 0.40443939384 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0719514630095 0.0528353158467 136% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 4.45695364238 179% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.26048565121 94% => OK
Positive topic words: 5.0 3.49668874172 143% => OK
Negative topic words: 6.0 3.62251655629 166% => OK
Neutral topic words: 4.0 3.1766004415 126% => OK
Total topic words: 15.0 10.2958057395 146% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Less content wanted. Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.