The reading is all about what are the different advantages what team work can achieve if they work together. In other words, team work always provide better results as compare to individual performing and task. But there are various disadvantages which the author claims.
First of all, there are many people involved in project work and they will have good knowledge, expertise and appropriate skills which will help people to contribute appropriately . The author oppose this by stating that even though there are many people involved in the team , but there are few real contributors to the project. Because of these real contributors project lead to higher results.
Secondly, if we are facing many issues than creative solutions can be acquired if group of people are working in same project. Remarkable efficient strategies can be implement to find solutions for risky task. For instance, as team work may involve many meeting and discussion as there are many people along with that they too have different mindset. This would create conflict between teammates.
Third, it also states that group of people contribute much more as compare to a person who works alone. Instead, if team members are not agreed with the possible solution team will have to drop the idea and stop execution of the project
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 181, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... help people to contribute appropriately . The author oppose this by stating that ...
^^
Line 2, column 194, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'opposes'.
Suggestion: opposes
...o contribute appropriately . The author oppose this by stating that even though there ...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 276, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ere are many people involved in the team , but there are few real contributors to ...
^^
Line 2, column 331, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...e few real contributors to the project. Because of these real contributors project lead...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 249, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun meeting seems to be countable; consider using: 'many meetings'.
Suggestion: many meetings
... For instance, as team work may involve many meeting and discussion as there are many people...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 65, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[1]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...at group of people contribute much more as compare to a person who works alone. In...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, second, secondly, so, third, for instance, first of all, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 12.0772626932 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 22.412803532 49% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 30.3222958057 73% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1096.0 1373.03311258 80% => OK
No of words: 215.0 270.72406181 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0976744186 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82921379641 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54271833903 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 145.348785872 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.586046511628 0.540411800872 108% => OK
syllable_count: 337.5 419.366225166 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 2.0 8.23620309051 24% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.25165562914 320% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.2523601305 49.2860985944 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.3333333333 110.228320801 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9166666667 21.698381199 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.16666666667 7.06452816374 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 4.19205298013 143% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.451117152978 0.272083759551 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.146950094117 0.0996497079465 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0806737218659 0.0662205650399 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.265757212865 0.162205337803 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0563751921242 0.0443174109184 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.3589403974 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 53.8541721854 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.0 12.2367328918 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.93 8.42419426049 94% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 63.6247240618 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.