The reading and the lecture both about how team work impacts on new assignment. Whereas the author of the reading states that group working is the most beneficial way to get a good result in new project, the lecture suggests that this method is less effective than working individual.The lecturer casts doubts on the main points made in the reading by providing three reasons.
First of all, according to the reading, many people can gather lots of information, so that they can answer people's question as soon as possible based on team member's knowledge. However, the lecturer disputes this point. He says that all the members aren't concentrated on what they do. Most of them are free but one or two members trying to solve problems and working on the project individually. Furthermore, he mentions that, if the assignment become successful, it is fortunate for whole team, not the few members who worked hard.
Secondly, the reading states that no team member afraid of answering the questions because of the collective. In addition, they can take responsibility for unsafe decision together. Nevertheless, the lecturer refutes this argument. He argues that members who have solution will be disregarded by other team members. Also long term work requires many conference and at that time group of people' can't understand with each other due to the different perspective.
Finally, the reading claims that team working is opportunity to recognize and in the end they can reach good consequence. On the other hand, the lecturer believe that if the team's project couldn't accomplish their goal, it is unfair for members who tried hard.
In conclusion, although the reading and lecture are both about impact of team work, the three main points made in the reading are effectively challenged by the lecture.
- TPO-50 3
- tpo 45 3
- TPO-52. Integrated Writing Task. Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they challenge the specific points made in the reading passage. 83
- TPO-03 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is more important to keep your old friends than it is to make new friends.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 66
- Integrated Writing Essay Tpo-54 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 285, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
... less effective than working individual.The lecturer casts doubts on the main point...
Line 2, column 160, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'members'' or 'member's'?
Suggestion: members'; member's
...stion as soon as possible based on team members knowledge. However, the lecturer disput...
Line 2, column 250, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
...his point. He says that all the members arent concentrated on what they do. Most of t...
Line 3, column 316, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
...l be disregarded by other team members. Also long term work requires many conference...
Line 3, column 345, Rule ID: MANY_NN
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun conference seems to be countable; consider using: 'many conferences'.
Suggestion: many conferences
...m members. Also long term work requires many conference and at that time group of people cant u...
Line 3, column 394, Rule ID: CANT
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...erence and at that time group of people cant understand with each other due to the d...
Line 4, column 188, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
...turer believe that if the teams project couldnt accomplish their goal, it is unfair for...
Line 5, column 169, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
... effectively challenged by the lecture.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, whereas, in addition, in conclusion, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 22.412803532 107% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 30.3222958057 109% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1511.0 1373.03311258 110% => OK
No of words: 297.0 270.72406181 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08754208754 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73086183589 2.5805825403 106% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 145.348785872 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572390572391 0.540411800872 106% => OK
syllable_count: 447.3 419.366225166 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.9257620058 49.2860985944 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.733333333 110.228320801 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8 21.698381199 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4666666667 7.06452816374 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 4.19205298013 191% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.358504850523 0.272083759551 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119603285054 0.0996497079465 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0559068391844 0.0662205650399 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.197531439579 0.162205337803 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0822946854801 0.0443174109184 186% => OK
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.3589403974 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.8541721854 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.2367328918 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.14 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 63.6247240618 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.