The reading passage and the lecturer both discuss the effect of cooperation of people as a team to do projects. While the passage advocates this idea by stating its benefits, the lecturer refutes that by presenting a number of reasons.
According to the reading, all team members altogether have wide range of knowledge and skills that lead to be highly beneficial for team members. Nonetheless, the speaker claims that the members who work well and have insight, will not be named and considered like the other who do not play vital role.
As reported by the text, since the number of people who have dealt with project is high, they can work rapidly. This results in having access the creative solution. Nevertheless, as it is alleged in the listening, in spite of having many members, it is impossible to get results quickly. Owing to more meeting sessions need to be organized which takes longtime.
Finally, as stated in the passage, this will be so pleasure for whom have ideas. By sharing his idea, he will get feedback from the other members that leads into his theory will be matured. Notwithstanding, it is asserted by the lecturer, although some people in group have brilliant idea, they will be ignored by the others specially who is more influential in team.
Discourse Markers used:
['finally', 'nevertheless', 'nonetheless', 'so', 'well', 'while', 'in spite of']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.209016393443 0.261695866417 80% => OK
Verbs: 0.204918032787 0.158904122519 129% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0450819672131 0.0723426182421 62% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0614754098361 0.0435111971325 141% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0368852459016 0.0277247811725 133% => OK
Prepositions: 0.135245901639 0.128828473217 105% => OK
Participles: 0.077868852459 0.0370669169778 210% => Less participles wanted.
Conjunctions: 2.63186449396 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0245901639344 0.0208969081088 118% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00154638098197 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.102459016393 0.128158765124 80% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0245901639344 0.0158828679856 155% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0327868852459 0.0114777025283 286% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1279.0 1645.83664459 78% => OK
No of words: 218.0 271.125827815 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.86697247706 6.08160592843 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84250218741 4.04852973271 95% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.339449541284 0.374372842146 91% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.266055045872 0.287516216867 93% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.188073394495 0.187439937562 100% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.100917431193 0.113142543107 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63186449396 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 145.348785872 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.582568807339 0.539623497131 108% => OK
Word variations: 56.3090897364 53.8517498576 105% => OK
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0529801325 84% => OK
Sentence length: 19.8181818182 21.7502111507 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.4538461469 49.3711431718 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.272727273 132.220823453 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8181818182 21.7502111507 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.636363636364 0.878197800319 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 3.39072847682 0% => OK
Readability: 46.4236864053 50.5018328374 92% => OK
Elegance: 1.39189189189 1.90840788429 73% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.595482221208 0.549887131256 108% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.122244457718 0.142949733639 86% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0708330678262 0.0787303798458 90% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.611867064024 0.631733273073 97% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.145355296627 0.139662658121 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.25408269671 0.266732575781 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0943260877368 0.103435571967 91% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.276657387178 0.414875509568 67% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0381085806875 0.0530846634433 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.39205450558 0.40443939384 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0568861676313 0.0528353158467 108% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.26048565121 47% => OK
Positive topic words: 7.0 3.49668874172 200% => OK
Negative topic words: 0.0 3.62251655629 0% => More negative topic words wanted.
Neutral topic words: 1.0 3.1766004415 31% => OK
Total topic words: 8.0 10.2958057395 78% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.