The paragraph states about the positives and advantages of the group work in an organisation whereas the lecture shows the opposite opinion and cast doubt on the paragraph.
The paragraph describes about the advantage of the group work to the company that group has wider knowledge, expertise in compare to the single one. The group can work quickly in response to the task with great and creative ideas. Contrary to this, lecture shows that group generally takes number of meetings for the group to understand the concept and problem issues of the task. In compare to the group, task will be more influential with one or two individual. Some creative ideas by individual are likely to be dropped if the other members ignore.
In the other hand, paragraph shows that taking part in a group process will be rewarding for the members and they feel good if their decision has to be carried out. Also the individual member has a much chance to shine because his /her ideas not only recognized but recognized significant. Whereas lecture tells that some members use to take free ride in the group work and don’t contribute in the task while some individual use to go well inside the topic and put effort in the task. Talking about the feeling of the real contributor, it is opposite to the paragraph because work has been recognized whole as a group and the result of the story will be different if the project fails.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 149, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...expertise in compare to the single one. The group can work quickly in response to t...
^^^
Line 3, column 165, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...f their decision has to be carried out. Also the individual member has a much chance...
^^^^
Line 3, column 196, Rule ID: A_MUCH_NN1[1]
Message: Maybe you should omit the article "a", leaving only 'much'.
Suggestion: much
...ied out. Also the individual member has a much chance to shine because his /her ideas ...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 330, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...Whereas lecture tells that some members use to take free ride in the group work and...
^^^
Line 3, column 430, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...ibute in the task while some individual use to go well inside the topic and put eff...
^^^
Line 3, column 691, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...will be different if the project fails.
^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'if', 'so', 'well', 'whereas', 'while', 'as to', 'talking about']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.270676691729 0.261695866417 103% => OK
Verbs: 0.146616541353 0.158904122519 92% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0789473684211 0.0723426182421 109% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0300751879699 0.0435111971325 69% => OK
Pronouns: 0.015037593985 0.0277247811725 54% => OK
Prepositions: 0.131578947368 0.128828473217 102% => OK
Participles: 0.0338345864662 0.0370669169778 91% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.50696549675 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0451127819549 0.0208969081088 216% => Less infinitives wanted.
Particles: 0.00375939849624 0.00154638098197 243% => OK
Determiners: 0.146616541353 0.128158765124 114% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.015037593985 0.0158828679856 95% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00751879699248 0.0114777025283 66% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1421.0 1645.83664459 86% => OK
No of words: 247.0 271.125827815 91% => OK
Chars per words: 5.75303643725 6.08160592843 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96437052324 4.04852973271 98% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.2995951417 0.374372842146 80% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.242914979757 0.287516216867 84% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.145748987854 0.187439937562 78% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.113360323887 0.113142543107 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50696549675 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 145.348785872 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.518218623482 0.539623497131 96% => OK
Word variations: 48.8777277137 53.8517498576 91% => OK
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0529801325 77% => OK
Sentence length: 24.7 21.7502111507 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.8429013638 49.3711431718 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.1 132.220823453 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7 21.7502111507 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.9 0.878197800319 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.09492273731 73% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 3.39072847682 177% => OK
Readability: 48.9914979757 50.5018328374 97% => OK
Elegance: 2.27450980392 1.90840788429 119% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.647968690149 0.549887131256 118% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.170463668627 0.142949733639 119% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.095197521945 0.0787303798458 121% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.671265090373 0.631733273073 106% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.160691501928 0.139662658121 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.374728362859 0.266732575781 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0676435106446 0.103435571967 65% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.60100688194 0.414875509568 145% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0821077583217 0.0530846634433 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.512044651552 0.40443939384 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.116569201741 0.0528353158467 221% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.26048565121 0% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 7.0 3.49668874172 200% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 3.62251655629 55% => OK
Neutral topic words: 0.0 3.1766004415 0% => More neutral topic words wanted.
Total topic words: 9.0 10.2958057395 87% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Not in a correct format.
The correct pattern:
para 1: introduction
para 2: doubt 1
para 3: doubt 2
para 4: doubt 3
Less contents wanted from the reading passages(25%) but more content wanted from the lecture (75%).
Don't need a conclusion paragraph.
Read sample essays from ETS:
http://www.testbig.com/users/toeflwritingmaster
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.