The passage states that some Rembrant paintings are not really his works. In addition, it states some reasons for this concept. On the contrary, the speaker believes that these works are indeed rembrant works and rejects the resons that are stated in the passage.
First, the passage states a fact about unreal condition of the girl in the portrait. Considering the fact that rembrant was well known artist in real painting, the luxurious dress of the girl does not show a girl who is a servant. On the other hand, according to the investigation, the speaker believe that the colors are originally true collers so that these painting belongs to the originally well known artist.
Also, the passage states uncorrelation in light and shadow in the evaluated portraits. Since rembrant was a good artist in using elements in his painting, abnormal lighting conditions demonstrate unoriginality of the works. On the contrary, the speaker thinks these lighting are apparent after some post analysis and final result shows some light and shaddow effects on the paintings.
Finally, the passage gives some evidence about separate parts of woods that are used in back of the paintings that are different from the original artist. The speaker rejects this belief and sayes that these separate parts of woods are used because of their values and the samples showe the same tree is used in the other approved portrays of the rembrant.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 175, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a servant' or simply 'servants'?
Suggestion: a servant; servants
... not show the girl whose position is as a servants in the society and it is not rempant we...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 59, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...states uncorrelation in light and shadow in the evaluated portraits. Since rembra...
^^
Line 7, column 250, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eparate parts of woods are used becausof their values and the sample showes that ...
^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'finally', 'first', 'if', 'really', 'so', 'well', 'for example', 'in addition', 'on the contrary', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.264925373134 0.261695866417 101% => OK
Verbs: 0.14552238806 0.158904122519 92% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0858208955224 0.0723426182421 119% => OK
Adverbs: 0.044776119403 0.0435111971325 103% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0223880597015 0.0277247811725 81% => OK
Prepositions: 0.141791044776 0.128828473217 110% => OK
Participles: 0.0410447761194 0.0370669169778 111% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.4609330481 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0111940298507 0.0208969081088 54% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00154638098197 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.164179104478 0.128158765124 128% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0 0.0158828679856 0% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0186567164179 0.0114777025283 163% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1494.0 1645.83664459 91% => OK
No of words: 248.0 271.125827815 91% => OK
Chars per words: 6.02419354839 6.08160592843 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96837696647 4.04852973271 98% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.370967741935 0.374372842146 99% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.282258064516 0.287516216867 98% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.189516129032 0.187439937562 101% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.100806451613 0.113142543107 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4609330481 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 145.348785872 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.512096774194 0.539623497131 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 48.1254944797 53.8517498576 89% => OK
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0529801325 84% => OK
Sentence length: 22.5454545455 21.7502111507 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.0621211872 49.3711431718 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.818181818 132.220823453 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5454545455 21.7502111507 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.09090909091 0.878197800319 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 3.39072847682 88% => OK
Readability: 50.7712609971 50.5018328374 101% => OK
Elegance: 2.10526315789 1.90840788429 110% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.52722444301 0.549887131256 96% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.159434194203 0.142949733639 112% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.106860876558 0.0787303798458 136% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.687437958351 0.631733273073 109% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.158177706984 0.139662658121 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.27750864091 0.266732575781 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0941171863892 0.103435571967 91% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.437793271283 0.414875509568 106% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0194052084602 0.0530846634433 37% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.388780199675 0.40443939384 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0801215666129 0.0528353158467 152% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.26048565121 117% => OK
Positive topic words: 4.0 3.49668874172 114% => OK
Negative topic words: 1.0 3.62251655629 28% => More negative topic words wanted.
Neutral topic words: 5.0 3.1766004415 157% => OK
Total topic words: 10.0 10.2958057395 97% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.