The lecture and the reading passage both discuss about the painting of an elderly woman by Rembrandt. While the reading casts a doubt on the authenticity of being actual work by Rembrandt, the lecture refutes this, saying that it is Rembrandt creation.
First of all, the reading claims the dressing style of the woman in the portrait is a mismatch. Woman is wearing a cap usually wore by servants while the fur collar on her dress contrasts her economic status. Rembrandt is known for his attention to details. However, the lecture argues that a careful inspection of the colors used in the painting revealed that the collar was not part of the original painting. In fact it was added 100 years after the painting was created to increase the value of the painting.
In addition, the reading makes an argument that Rembrandt is considered as a master of light and shadow in his paintings. The portrait is a misfit to what he is known for. Face of the woman is illuminated by light below but the fur collar below her face is of dark color and light should be absorbed by that collar instead of reflecting it. The lecture counters this point by stating removal of fur collar revealed the original light colored dress worn by the woman and explains the illumination on her face.
Lastly the reading passage points out that Rembrandt used wooden panels for painting, but the portrait have several glued panels at the back and this questions the authenticity of the painting. The lecture refutes the claim by stating the panels were glued together at the same time the fur collar was added. Moreover, the professor says the original panel used for the portrait is from the same tree, Rembrandt used for his other work.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 178, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the authenticity of being actual work by Rembrandt, the lecture refutes this, say...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, lastly, moreover, so, then, while, in addition, in fact, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 10.4613686534 163% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 12.0772626932 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 22.412803532 89% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 30.3222958057 135% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1426.0 1373.03311258 104% => OK
No of words: 299.0 270.72406181 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.76923076923 5.08290768461 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44946234372 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 145.348785872 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.468227424749 0.540411800872 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 426.6 419.366225166 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.0268702393 49.2860985944 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.857142857 110.228320801 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3571428571 21.698381199 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.42857142857 7.06452816374 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.27373068433 187% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.410724693958 0.272083759551 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.142655173569 0.0996497079465 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0584319530521 0.0662205650399 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.249818545708 0.162205337803 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0267496188093 0.0443174109184 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.3589403974 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 53.8541721854 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 12.2367328918 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.64 8.42419426049 91% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 63.6247240618 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.