Both the reading and lecture are about Rembrandt, a 17th century Dutch painter, and his painting named "portrait of an elderly woman in a white bonnet". The reading passage indicates that there are some details in the painting which prove that the painting was not painted by Rembrandt. However, the professor in the listening disagrees with this.
First of all, the reading passage suggests that Rembrandt did not draw the painting because the woman wear a servant white line cap while she has a luxurious fur collar. However, the lecturer challenges this point by showing that the luxurious fur collar was added 100 years later. It means that the painting mentioned in the reading passage is not Rembrandt's original painting. This is because someone believed that adding the luxurious fur collar would increase the value of the painting.
Secondly, the author states that the painting light and shadow do not fit together, therefore; it is not Rembrandt's work. In the response, the lecturer says that these elements do not fit together because the luxurious fur collar was added. In fact, she argues that in the original painting the woman wears a light color collar. Thus, the light and shadow in original painting is extremely realistic and it is the painting of Rembrandt.
Lastly, base on the fact that several pieces of wood in the painting glued together, the reading claims that the painting was not drew by Rembrandt. On the other hand, the professor argues that the wood panel was enlarged with extra wood species to make the painting more value. The lecturer also implies that the origin painting is painted on a single piece of wood. Moreover, it is very same the tree which was drew in another painting by Rembrandt.
- TPO-03 - Integrated Writing Task Rembrandt is the most famous of the seventeenth-century Dutch painters. However, there are doubts whether some paintings attributed to Rembrandt were actually painted by him. One such painting is known as attributed to Rem 80
- The following appeared as a recommendation by a committee planning a ten-year budget for the city of Calatrava. "The birthrate in our city is declining: in fact, last year's birthrate was only one-half that of five years ago. Thus the number of students e 50
- The following appeared in a memorandum from the planning department of an electric power company. "Several recent surveys indicate that home owners are increasingly eager to conserve energy. At the same time, manufacturers are now marketing many home appl 83
- Nature's Way, a chain of stores selling health food and other health-related products, is opening its next franchise in the town of Plainsville. The store should prove to be very successful: Nature's Way franchises tend to be most profitable in areas wher 66
- The following appeared in an editorial in a local newspaper. "Commuters complain that increased rush-hour traffic on Blue Highway between the suburbs and the city center has doubled their commuting time. The favored proposal of the motorists' lobby is to 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 131, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'drawn'.
...eading claims that the painting was not drew by Rembrandt. On the other hand, the pr...
Line 7, column 414, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'drawn'.
...ver, it is very same the tree which was drew in another painting by Rembrandt.
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'first', 'however', 'lastly', 'moreover', 'second', 'secondly', 'so', 'therefore', 'thus', 'while', 'in fact', 'first of all', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.268292682927 0.261695866417 103% => OK
Verbs: 0.161585365854 0.158904122519 102% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0609756097561 0.0723426182421 84% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0670731707317 0.0435111971325 154% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0213414634146 0.0277247811725 77% => OK
Prepositions: 0.131097560976 0.128828473217 102% => OK
Participles: 0.0396341463415 0.0370669169778 107% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.50159453746 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0030487804878 0.0208969081088 15% => Some infinitives wanted.
Particles: 0.0 0.00154638098197 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.15243902439 0.128158765124 119% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0030487804878 0.0158828679856 19% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00609756097561 0.0114777025283 53% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1752.0 1645.83664459 106% => OK
No of words: 292.0 271.125827815 108% => OK
Chars per words: 6.0 6.08160592843 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.04852973271 102% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.356164383562 0.374372842146 95% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.297945205479 0.287516216867 104% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.205479452055 0.187439937562 110% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.106164383562 0.113142543107 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50159453746 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 145.348785872 94% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.469178082192 0.539623497131 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 45.3620256483 53.8517498576 84% => OK
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0529801325 115% => OK
Sentence length: 19.4666666667 21.7502111507 90% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.9999233715 49.3711431718 59% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.8 132.220823453 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4666666667 21.7502111507 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.933333333333 0.878197800319 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 3.39072847682 59% => OK
Readability: 49.2611872146 50.5018328374 98% => OK
Elegance: 1.75609756098 1.90840788429 92% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.688724987122 0.549887131256 125% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.165315716909 0.142949733639 116% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0748218547808 0.0787303798458 95% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.670593596522 0.631733273073 106% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.0918997099406 0.139662658121 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.365174200073 0.266732575781 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0845676223201 0.103435571967 82% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.553187360058 0.414875509568 133% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0475332853291 0.0530846634433 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.552459122917 0.40443939384 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0394580432284 0.0528353158467 75% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.26048565121 141% => OK
Positive topic words: 4.0 3.49668874172 114% => OK
Negative topic words: 5.0 3.62251655629 138% => OK
Neutral topic words: 6.0 3.1766004415 189% => OK
Total topic words: 15.0 10.2958057395 146% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.